Hi,
I have the following compile error with gcc-4.9. Is there an issue
with the macro/inline, or is it just dead code?
--- citrus_prop.So ---
/usr/local/bin/mips-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc -isystem
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
Thanks!
-adrian
adrian@lucy-11i386:~/work/freebsd/head-embedded/src/lib % svn
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2780/changes
Changes:
[bapt] Fix buildworld by adding libproc and librtld_db to the _prebuild_libs
Those are needed to build libdtrace
--
[...truncated 87231 lines...]
building shared library libthr.so.3
cc
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2779/changes
Changes:
[rpaulo] ti_pruss: pass the correct IRQ to userland.
Also, fix several problems with the kqueue notification.
Submitted by: Manuel Stühn freebsdnewbie at freenet.de
--
On May 20, 2015, at 0:09, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I have the following compile error with gcc-4.9. Is there an issue
with the macro/inline, or is it just dead code?
--- citrus_prop.So ---
/usr/local/bin/mips-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc -isystem
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
Of course,
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2778/changes
Changes:
[ganbold] D2432 (Patch for Amlogic single core PIC) moved the SMP option out
of AML8726 and into board specific config files since some boards
(e.g. YYHD18) use the aml8726-m3 which only have a single core.
r283057 applied
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/161/changes
Changes:
[rpaulo] ti_pruss: pass the correct IRQ to userland.
Also, fix several problems with the kqueue notification.
Submitted by: Manuel Stühn freebsdnewbie at freenet.de
[ganbold] D2432 (Patch for Amlogic single core PIC)
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/162/changes
Changes:
[ae] In the reply to SADB_X_SPDGET message use the same sequence number that
was in the request. Some IKE deamons expect it will the same. Linux and
NetBSD also follow this behaviour.
PR: 137309
MFC after:
On May 20, 2015, at 5:49, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:50:24AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Current sources (r283136) die on buildworld with the following error:
[...]
--- cddl/lib__L ---
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lproc
cc: error:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:50:24AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Current sources (r283136) die on buildworld with the following error:
[...]
--- cddl/lib__L ---
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lproc
cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
***
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2781/changes
Changes:
[ngie] Build cddl/{sbin,usr.bin,usr.sbin} in parallel as all of the
applications are
freestanding (they require libraries build via make libraries in buildworld)
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2782/changes
Changes:
[ngie] Unbreak the arm64/sparc64 tinderbox by only compiling lib/libproc and
lib/librtld_db on architectures where they're supported
Reported by: bz, Jenkins
Pointyhat to: bapt
[ngie] cddl/lib/libctf isn't always a
On 2015-5-20, at 17:42, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, I bet that you have a bunch of CPUs and ixl is consuming all of your
interrupt vectors. Does setting this tunable fix the issue?
hw.ixl.max_queues=1
Yeah, this box has 40 cores, but unfortunately that tunable doesn't change
Oh, I bet that you have a bunch of CPUs and ixl is consuming all of your
interrupt vectors. Does setting this tunable fix the issue?
hw.ixl.max_queues=1
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On May 20, 2015, at 6:09, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 20, 2015, at 5:49, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:50:24AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Current sources (r283136) die on buildworld with the following error:
[...]
---
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:09:16AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 20, 2015, at 5:49, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:50:24AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Current sources (r283136) die on buildworld with the following error:
[...]
---
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
The calls to
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_i386/163/changes
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I have put patches to camcontrol(8) to implement the attrib subcommand
here:
FreeBSD/head as of SVN revision 283160:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ken/camcontrol_attrib.20150520.1.txt
FreeBSD stable/10 as of SVN revision 283161:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
I've set up a Jenkins build of trunk using gcc 4.9:
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/
That build also keeps track of
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD/2783/changes
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 20 May 2015 at 17:30, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
I've set up a Jenkins build of trunk using gcc 4.9:
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/4/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests/1044/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
How much of FreeBSD have you been able to compile with gcc 4.9, and on
which
platform?
I get down to a little bit inside libc before I hit unused code warnings.
What platform are you compiling on? Are you looking
On 20 May 2015 at 00:50, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to
27 matches
Mail list logo
