Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11

On Friday, October 14, 2016 05:50:40 PM Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/10/2016 00:39, Lewis Donzis wrote: > > After upgrading to FreeBSD 11.0 and changing source code to use the new > > version of “struct smbcmd”, some commands are not working as documented, > > specifically those that read data. > >

Re: asio and kqueue (2nd trye) (was: RE: (boost::)asio and kqueue problem)

Patch generally lgtm ... just 1 nit comment: + } else { + if (sbavail(>so_rcv) >= so->so_rcv.sb_lowat) + return 1; + } Collapse the else and the block inside to just make it an `else if` for less branching. On

Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11

> On Oct 14, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Could you please open a bugzilla issue for the bug? > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Sure, will do. I was unsure of the effectiveness of that, because I filed a much more serious report about a different issue a couple

Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11

On 14/10/2016 18:11, Michael Gmelin wrote: > For some history on these changes, please see also [1] and [2] (there > were a few discussions and the revision was bumped, I also tried to > get some attention, but not enough it seems). > > Given your recent changes to iicbus in HEAD, I think it

Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:50:40 +0300 Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 14/10/2016 00:39, Lewis Donzis wrote: > > After upgrading to FreeBSD 11.0 and changing source code to use the > > new version of “struct smbcmd”, some commands are not working as > > documented, specifically those

Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11

On 14/10/2016 00:39, Lewis Donzis wrote: > After upgrading to FreeBSD 11.0 and changing source code to use the new > version of “struct smbcmd”, some commands are not working as documented, > specifically those that read data. > > As an example, SMB_READW is documented as returning the word read

Re: asio and kqueue (2nd trye) (was: RE: (boost::)asio and kqueue problem)

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 09:21:52AM +, hartmut.bra...@dlr.de wrote: > Hi all, > > here is the 2nd try taking into account the comments I received. Since I'm > not familiar with the locking in the sockets area I ask somebody with that > knowledge to check it before I commit it. I have only

Re: zfs crash on FreeBSD 10.3

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 00:19-0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I attempted to add a second partition to an existing FS pool in FreeBSD 10.3 > and the result was a crash.. > > is there anyone out there with a scratch system (10.3) (or two spare drives) > who can show me this working? > > Does it look

asio and kqueue (2nd trye) (was: RE: (boost::)asio and kqueue problem)

Hi all, here is the 2nd try taking into account the comments I received. Since I'm not familiar with the locking in the sockets area I ask somebody with that knowledge to check it before I commit it. Thanks, harti From: Scott Mitchell [mailto:scott.k.mit...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday,

CURRENT [r307305]: Crashing

Systems I updated to recent CURRENT start crashing spontaneously. recent crashing system is on 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #11 r307305: Fri Oct 14 08:37:59 CEST 2016 other (no access since it is remote and not accessible until later the day) has been updated ~ 12 hours ago and it is alos

RE: (boost::)asio and kqueue problem

I have a fix that works and is better and simpler than the previous and will try to put it together in the next few days. harti From: Scott Mitchell [mailto:scott.k.mit...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 2:16 AM To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: sepher...@gmail.com;

zfs crash on FreeBSD 10.3

I attempted to add a second partition to an existing FS pool in FreeBSD 10.3 and the result was a crash.. is there anyone out there with a scratch system (10.3) (or two spare drives) who can show me this working? Does it look familiar to anyone? The drive 'boot0' is being used as the root