Second Call for 2017Q4 quarterly status reports

Happy new year, and I hope that meltdown and spectre are not taking too much of everyone's time. That said, the submission deadline is still January 14th, so please do send in your status report entries to us! Thanks, Ben On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 06:27:16PM -0600, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Dear

Re: Intel CPU design flaw - FreeBSD affected?

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Mark Heily wrote: > On Jan 2, 2018 19:05, "Warner Losh" wrote: > > The register article says the specifics are under embargo still. That would > make it hard for anybody working with Intel to comment publicly on the flaw > and any

Re: Intel CPU design flaw - FreeBSD affected?

On Jan 2, 2018 19:05, "Warner Losh" wrote: The register article says the specifics are under embargo still. That would make it hard for anybody working with Intel to comment publicly on the flaw and any mitigations that may be underway. It would be unwise to assume that all the

Re: Programmatically cache line

On 01/03/18 13:37, Ed Schouten wrote: 2018-01-01 11:36 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Belousov : On x86, the CPUID instruction leaf 0x1 returns the information in %ebx register. Hm, weird. Why don't we extend sysctl to include this info? For the same reason we do not provide a

Re: Programmatically cache line

2018-01-01 11:36 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Belousov : >> >> On x86, the CPUID instruction leaf 0x1 returns the information in >> >> %ebx register. >> > >> > Hm, weird. Why don't we extend sysctl to include this info? > > For the same reason we do not provide a sysctl to add two

Re: USB stack

> On 3 Jan 2018, at 11:56, blubee blubeeme wrote: > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:41 PM, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > > > > On 3 Jan 2018, at 11:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? >

Re: USB stack

> On 3 Jan 2018, at 11:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? Absolutely. > Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes per > second which seems odd. What sort of test? What sort of device? What sort

Re: USB stack

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 6:41 PM, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > > > > On 3 Jan 2018, at 11:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? > > Absolutely. > > > Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8

USB stack

Does FreeBSD current USB stack support usb >= 2.0 devices? Testing out the USB devices support I get about 7.2-7.8 megabytes per second which seems odd. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Programmatically cache line

2018-01-02 2:27 GMT+01:00 blubee blubeeme : > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > On Mon, 2018-01-01 at 12:36 +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:52:37AM +, David Chisnall wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1