Re: Weird conditional logic in lib/libpmc/Makefile

2018-06-02 Thread Mark Millard
Shawn Webb shawn.webb at hardenedbsd.org wrote on Sun Jun 3 01:08:19 UTC 2018 : > Below is some logic pasted from lib/libpmc/Makefile: > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" > > .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "aarch64" > EVENT_ARCH="arm64" > .elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" ||

Re: Call for Testing: 12.0-CURRENT amd64 memstick installer boot-testing wanted

2018-06-02 Thread Albert
Hi, I successfully tested the memstick.img on: Acer Chromebook 14 (EDGAR) [CB3-431-C5EX] The Results: UEFI (Coreboot) works perfectly, no issues there. BIOS (SeaBIOS) does *NOT* work. It puts the machine into a bootloop until the install medium is disconnected. It does, however, make it past

Re: Elantech Touchpad Woes - Support for Elantech touchpads over i2c/SMBus still possibly missing

2018-06-02 Thread Albert
Michael, Good to know you still have plans to work on that eventually. It'd be much appreciated. Looking at the source for your cyapa driver, I see you've ported it from the DragonFlyBSD driver (and they in turn adapted it from the Linux one). I should've looked into that earlier... Instead

Weird conditional logic in lib/libpmc/Makefile

2018-06-02 Thread Shawn Webb
Hey all, Below is some logic pasted from lib/libpmc/Makefile: .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "aarch64" EVENT_ARCH="arm64" .elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "amd64" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" EVENT_ARCH="x86" .elif ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc"

Re: rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: permission denied

2018-06-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Jun, O. Hartmann wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On CURRENT, running on an APU as router/firewall service, out of the blue > after an update > I receive this weird message when trying to restart "named" (BIND 9.12, > latest from the > ports): > > service

Re: Proper way to remove never used ioctls

2018-06-02 Thread blubee blubeeme
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018, 02:34 Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > On 2018-06-02 20:36, Allan Jude wrote: > > On 2018-06-02 11:03, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Our sys/mouse.h header has a definition of

Re: Proper way to remove never used ioctls

2018-06-02 Thread Vladimir Kondratyev
On 2018-06-02 20:36, Allan Jude wrote: On 2018-06-02 11:03, Warner Losh wrote: On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: Hi, Our sys/mouse.h header has a definition of MOUSE_GETVARS and MOUSE_SETVARS ioctls which are not documented and only stubbed in a few drivers:

Re: Proper way to remove never used ioctls

2018-06-02 Thread Allan Jude
On 2018-06-02 11:03, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Our sys/mouse.h header has a definition of MOUSE_GETVARS and MOUSE_SETVARS >> ioctls which are not documented and only stubbed in a few drivers: mse(4), >> psm(4) and syscon's

Re: Proper way to remove never used ioctls

2018-06-02 Thread Warner Losh
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: > Hi, > > Our sys/mouse.h header has a definition of MOUSE_GETVARS and MOUSE_SETVARS > ioctls which are not documented and only stubbed in a few drivers: mse(4), > psm(4) and syscon's sysmouse(4). The only exception is MOUSE_GETVARS >

Proper way to remove never used ioctls

2018-06-02 Thread Vladimir Kondratyev
Hi, Our sys/mouse.h header has a definition of MOUSE_GETVARS and MOUSE_SETVARS ioctls which are not documented and only stubbed in a few drivers: mse(4), psm(4) and syscon's sysmouse(4). The only exception is MOUSE_GETVARS implemented in psm(4) Given the fact that they were introduced 20

Re: How to run drm-next-kmod on r334511

2018-06-02 Thread Masachika ISHIZUKA
When I updated to r334511, drm-next-kmod is not working with the message '[drm:fw_domain_wait_ack] render: timed out waiting for forcewake ack request.'. drm-next-kmod was working fine on r333704. My CPU is pentium G4560(kaby lake). >>> >>> We are working on a fix

Re: How to run drm-next-kmod on r334511

2018-06-02 Thread Niclas Zeising
On 06/02/18 09:56, Masachika ISHIZUKA wrote: When I updated to r334511, drm-next-kmod is not working with the message '[drm:fw_domain_wait_ack] render: timed out waiting for forcewake ack request.'. drm-next-kmod was working fine on r333704. My CPU is pentium G4560(kaby lake). We are

Re: Elantech Touchpad Woes - Support for Elantech touchpads over i2c/SMBus still possibly missing

2018-06-02 Thread Michael Gmelin
> On 2. Jun 2018, at 12:41, Matthias Apitz wrote: > >> On Saturday, 2 June 2018 12:26:03 CEST, Greg V >> wrote: >> ... >> cyapa is indeed not the right driver either. The "cy" is for Cypress. That's >> the touchpad found in e.g. the Acer C720. >> ... > > Side note: > > I own three C720,

Re: Elantech Touchpad Woes - Support for Elantech touchpads over i2c/SMBus still possibly missing

2018-06-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
On Saturday, 2 June 2018 12:26:03 CEST, Greg V wrote: ... cyapa is indeed not the right driver either. The "cy" is for Cypress. That's the touchpad found in e.g. the Acer C720. ... Side note: I own three C720, they all came with Cypress TP. One was for repair at Acer.com and returned

Re: panic: Assertion td->td_lock == TDQ_LOCKPTR(tdq) failed at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:2137

2018-06-02 Thread Ronald Klop
This happened again. Now I have a crashdump. Anyone interested? Some more answers below. On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 17:41:54 +0200, bob prohaska wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: I had a crash on my RPI-3B+ running freebsd 12/aarch64 from the 29 may snapshot.

Re: Elantech Touchpad Woes - Support for Elantech touchpads over i2c/SMBus still possibly missing

2018-06-02 Thread Greg V
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Albert wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start out by saying that I'm a newcomer to FreeBSD, but I've been running Linux for years now and I'm still having a few issues transitioning. Despite that. I've been having a blast setting things up for myself, and I'm

Re: How to run drm-next-kmod on r334511

2018-06-02 Thread Masachika ISHIZUKA
>> When I updated to r334511, drm-next-kmod is not working with >> the message '[drm:fw_domain_wait_ack] render: timed out waiting >> for forcewake ack request.'. >> drm-next-kmod was working fine on r333704. >> My CPU is pentium G4560(kaby lake). > > We are working on a fix now. > Sorry

Re: Call for Testing: 12.0-CURRENT amd64 memstick installer boot-testing wanted

2018-06-02 Thread Maurizio Vairani
2018-05-30 17:50 GMT+02:00 Glen Barber : > Hi, > > Could folks please help boot-test the most recent 12.0-CURRENT amd64 > memstick images on various hardware? Note, this is not a request to > install 12.0-CURRENT, only a boot-test with various system knobs > tweaked. > > The most recent images

rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953: permission denied

2018-06-02 Thread O. Hartmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On CURRENT, running on an APU as router/firewall service, out of the blue after an update I receive this weird message when trying to restart "named" (BIND 9.12, latest from the ports): service named restart rndc: connect failed: 127.0.0.1#953:

Re: How to run drm-next-kmod on r334511

2018-06-02 Thread Johannes Lundberg
Masachika ISHIZUKA writes: > Hi. > > When I updated to r334511, drm-next-kmod is not working with > the message '[drm:fw_domain_wait_ack] render: timed out waiting > for forcewake ack request.'. > > drm-next-kmod was working fine on r333704. > > My CPU is pentium G4560(kaby lake). Hi