"cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)

2019-09-10 Thread Mark Millard
In a context with: # cpuset -g pid -1 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 pid -1 domain policy: first-touch mask: 0, 1 I get: # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:0 COMMAND cpuset: setdomain: Invalid argument # cpuset -l0 -n prefer:2

Re: Building world with gcc9 not working

2019-09-10 Thread Rebecca Cran
On 2019-09-09 23:08, Warner Losh wrote: > >> Aspirationally, yes. I did a successful CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc >> buildworld earlier this week. (It doesn't play well with binary pkg's >> built with Clang, so I ended up replacing it with a Clang-built world >> instead, but it compiled.) >> >>

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019, 1:43 PM Ian Lepore wrote: > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 21:41 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 10 Sep 2019, at 20:14, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:01 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > However, please do *NOT* remove the sys/*/compile directories. > >

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Ian Lepore
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 21:41 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 10 Sep 2019, at 20:14, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:01 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > However, please do *NOT* remove the sys/*/compile directories. > > > > > > Warner > > > > Uhhh... that's interesting. I

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 10 Sep 2019, at 20:14, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:01 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> However, please do *NOT* remove the sys/*/compile directories. >> >> Warner > > Uhhh... that's interesting. I just nuked one of those on my system > yesterday, because it had been hanging

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Ian Lepore
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:01 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > However, please do *NOT* remove the sys/*/compile directories. > > Warner Uhhh... that's interesting. I just nuked one of those on my system yesterday, because it had been hanging around since 2013 and I had no idea what was -- I just

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:58 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:33 AM Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: > >> Hi Developers, >> >> My -head source tree might be dirty over the years, but there appears to >> be some empty directories. Can these just be removed? >> > > I've removed

Re: Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Warner Losh
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:33 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > Hi Developers, > > My -head source tree might be dirty over the years, but there appears to > be some empty directories. Can these just be removed? > I've removed the ones I know are safe to remove, trying to mirror the commits they

Source tree has many empty directories?

2019-09-10 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi Developers, My -head source tree might be dirty over the years, but there appears to be some empty directories. Can these just be removed? --HPS find . -type d -empty ./sys/fs/nandfs ./sys/mips/gxemul ./sys/gnu/dts/include/dt-bindings/genpd ./sys/modules/drm/r128 ./sys/modules/drm/sis

Re: panic: rcv_start < rcv_end

2019-09-10 Thread Yuri Pankov
Michael Tuexen wrote: On 10. Sep 2019, at 14:37, Yuri Pankov wrote: Just seen this almost immediately after booting the system installed from amd64-20190906-r351901 snapshot, trying to do initial pkg bootstrap. Sadly, I didn't have the swap/dump device configured at the time, so no dump was

Re: panic: rcv_start < rcv_end

2019-09-10 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 09/10/2019 9:20 am, Michael Tuexen wrote: On 10. Sep 2019, at 14:37, Yuri Pankov wrote: Just seen this almost immediately after booting the system installed from amd64-20190906-r351901 snapshot, trying to do initial pkg bootstrap. Sadly, I didn't have the swap/dump device configured at

Re: panic: rcv_start < rcv_end

2019-09-10 Thread Michael Tuexen
> On 10. Sep 2019, at 14:37, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > Just seen this almost immediately after booting the system installed from > amd64-20190906-r351901 snapshot, trying to do initial pkg bootstrap. Sadly, > I didn't have the swap/dump device configured at the time, so no dump was > saved. >

panic: rcv_start < rcv_end

2019-09-10 Thread Yuri Pankov
Just seen this almost immediately after booting the system installed from amd64-20190906-r351901 snapshot, trying to do initial pkg bootstrap. Sadly, I didn't have the swap/dump device configured at the time, so no dump was saved. But it looks like I'm not alone, seeing the

Re: ntpd segfaults on start

2019-09-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:42:43PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:12 PM Ian Lepore wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 21:44 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 12:13:24PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 09:30 -0700, Rodney