Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:15:57AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
...
#6 0xc049f355 in vm_fault (map=0xc6fc1700, vaddr=0, fault_type=1 '\001',
fault_flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:219
#7 0xc04eddd9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xdd699b18, usermode=0, eva=0)
at
if it were possible and not too
difficult. The problem should likely be addressed given people
might want to create snapshots around the same time they run find
via the maintanence scripts.
--
Adam - Migus Dot Org (http://www.migus.org)
___
[EMAIL
or object to the idea?
My motivation for asking is simply to avoid having to distribute/use
this program with the performance testing stuff as previously
(before I cared about nano-second precision) I just used
/usr/bin/date to generate the datestamps.
--
Adam - Migus Dot Org (http://www.migus.org
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins said:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:49:42PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
WRT the mime thing. My apologies. It never occured to me as
everyone I
know personally uses a real mail reader. I'd attached them
simply to
keep the scrolling down and allow
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Adam Migus writes:
Folks,
While doing some performance analysis (doing make -j5 buildkernel)
on a set of 14 kernels I've hit one using the SCHED_ULE scheduler
that hangs. It happens every time but not necessarily in the same
place in the make.
...
The hardware
Bruce M Simpson said:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:09:44PM -0400, Adam Migus wrote:
The hardware is a dual Xeon box. The kernel is SMP w/ SCHED_ULE
instead of SCHED_4BSD, the options required for diskless and the
following two options:
options CPU_FASTER_5X86_FPU
options
.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mouth also try using
your full name in your email address too so people can
use it when calling you a pompous ass. I wouldn't want
people getting us confused...
Regards,
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com
. While I can't get paid to test non
TrustedBSD testing, I can use the hardware (on my own time) to
test. I'm more than happy to do that.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http
This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
but it's very easy to change.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org
Me too, so if it does require one someone please tell me. I obviously
read the code and from my understanding no locking is fine but I
could be wrong.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
:This patch makes usbd track
this patch. I'd like to see usbd go away. I'd
like to help devd take it's place.
Adam
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:01:28PM +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:29AM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
instead
quote who=Juli Mallett
* De: Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data:
2003-01-28 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Force 1 CPU on SMP kernel? ]
* Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030128 12:50]:
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:02PM -0500, Adam Migus
wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some
quote who=Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Yes, just to be more explicit. What I want to do is get
the
'real' difference a second processor makes. ie. If I run
GENERIC I'm not incurring the overhead associated with
SMP/APIC.
I want to use the same kernel
. If your driver requires pcm, the loader
will load it as a dependancy.
Adam
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
be the 'best' way to make an SMP
kernel only start/use CPU0?
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org)
FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current
mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
--
Adam Migus
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD (http://www.trustedbsd.org) | The Power To Secure
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
interest in ownership of the nullfs/unionfs
code, I'd like to work with them. If no one does and someone
wants me to, I may, but at a later date when I'm more
comfortable doing so. Third, if someone else attempts to
find/fix the bug, consider me an interested.
--
Adam Migus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo
