Re: A few issues I ran into (and a quick question)

2000-10-26 Thread Dan Papasian
with a problem, go back and compile your kernel with no more than -O -pipe. -- Dan Papasian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "How are we to distinguish the difference between reality and dream? Dreams result from a relationship of atoms. So do our bodies." --Charles Augustus

Re: Burned by config changes?

2000-07-12 Thread Dan Papasian
What optimizations did you use when compiling your kernel? (COPTFLAGS) If it's anything more than -O -pipe, then that may very well be your problem. -Dan On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 09:28:44PM -0400, Patrick Gardella wrote: I've somehow been burned by the config changes when I build world

Re: let badsect recog IFCHR in 5.0-C

2000-06-27 Thread Dan Papasian
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:38:21PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote: Thus spake Clive Lin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): - memcpy(name_dir_end + 1, name_dir_end, strlen(name_dir_end) + 1); - *name_dir_end = 'r'; + // un-needed. + // memcpy(name_dir_end + 1, name_dir_end,

Re: Help! can't 'startx' - missing libc.so

2000-06-25 Thread Dan Papasian
This would probably be more appropriate on -questions. I take it the problem started when you updated? Sounds like you may need to recompile your X server or install compat3x (the latter is the sane choice) -Dan On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 11:46:24PM -0400, John Daniels wrote: Hi: I am using

Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development

2000-06-21 Thread Dan Papasian
Eivind Elkund was talking about doing something like this. He had a pretty nice document about it, too. If I recall, the name was "OVCS: Open Version Control System" Perhaps someone could fill in the blanks? I couldn't find the document at the address I thought it was kept,

Re: current lockups

2000-03-06 Thread Dan Papasian
enabled? Perhaps there is a locking issue? However, that'd lead to a panic I'd imagine.. So see if you can reproduce this with one CPU running so we can at least eliminate one of the variables. -Dan Papasian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs

Re: current lockups

2000-03-05 Thread Dan Papasian
amount of these questions, there is a good chance that your processor(s) are overheating. Try improving the airflow to the case (But using a household fan isn't recommended due to EMI) -Dan Papasian [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 11:50:10PM -0800, Arun Sharma wrote: Compiling Mozilla

Re: which(1), rewritten in C?

2000-03-03 Thread Dan Papasian
Can you please give an example of where multiple arguments doesn't work as expected? It works fine over here. -Dan Papasian On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 07:59:37PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: --snip-- It doesn't seem to handle multiple arguments. File a PR and fix the issues and I'll look

Re: which(1), rewritten in C?

2000-03-03 Thread Dan Papasian
Ah, well, I hadn't picked up that that was the desired behavoir. Well, it is fixed: http://bugg.strangled.net/which.c -Dan Papasian [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:09:29AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Dan Papasian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000303 04:39] wrote: Can you please give

Re: /usr/ports/ too big?

2000-02-12 Thread Dan Papasian
. Considering most of us out there, myself included, have fallen madly in love with ports the way it is, I doubt that the current system won't go away for a long, long time. -Dan Papasian [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:58:06PM +0100, Kai Voigt wrote: Hello, I'm just doing