On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:24:58AM -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote:
[...]
Okay, here's my question: what is/was so bad about pppd + natd?
Generating 10% of the total support load for FreeBSD on IRC is so bad
about it. And I
And I'm not active enough that I feel I have any right to any form of veto.
Thanks. I'm not against documenting something, if I understand
what this something should be.
That people absolutely should use ppp -nat instead of pppd+natd, and that
this goes even if people ALREADY has a
(Based on suggestion from Robert Watson.)
I want to enable INVARIANTS by default in -current. This result in some
slowdown, but it also makes it more likely that we'll find bugs quickly.
People that want to run -current should know enough to disable it if it is
in the way, anyway.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:06:14PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone give a quick explanation what INVARIANTS does?
It adds more internal consistency checks to the kernel. This make bugs show
up more promptly and in a more predictable fashion, which again makes it
easier to fix the
After discussion with obrien, jhb, and dwithe (and non-protests from
the other committers present), I'm changing the defaults for remote
services in /etc/defaults/rc.conf to the least dangerous
configuration, and making sysinstall write out overrides for the
variables to their former default
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 09:09:22AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eivind Eklund writes:
: I believe putting down RELENG_4 without having a finished IPv6 and
: functional laptop support (I'm not sure what state this is in right
: now) would be a bad idea
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 01:52:29PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
: Eivind I *think* I know what this is due to - please upgrade
: Eivind src/sys/nfs/nfs_vnops.c to revision 1.146 (which I just
: Eivind committed) and try again.
:
:Tried it. Doesn't work. :-( It still crashes when creating
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 11:56:31PM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote:
I've been peering over the code, and I am unable to find anything
wrong :-( I've also gotten panic information and symbol information
from Viren, but this hasn't made me any wiser - the failure was in
setlock (which seems
On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 10:26:15AM -0500, Viren R.Shah wrote:
I'm running a -current system from Nov 26th (approx 4am EST).
I can currently reliably crash the system by doing:
ln -s /home/users/vshah/public_html/index.html /home/users/vshah/index.html
The crash only works when I do
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 01:04:29PM +0200, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
[Regarding a change to UUCP to have it log the username when the
password entry fails]
I don't have any religious feeling about this change, and I'm willing
to back it out and keep it as a local change again (the way it has
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 07:54:03AM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
Unless I hear unanimous fierce outcry against it, I'm strongly
considering making FTP_PASSIVE_MODE obsolete by virtue of being the
default for all tools/libraries which currently examine it.
FTP_ACTIVE_MODE will be the
On Tue, Nov 17, 1998 at 09:49:31PM -0500, HighWind Software Information wrote:
After installing the recent libc_r and libc, I'm getting:
ld.so failed: Undefined symbol SYS_kldsym in make:/usr/lib/aout/libc.so.3.1
I also get it sometimes when I link against libc_r.
SYS_kldsym is always
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 05:59:05PM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote:
Eivind Eklund said:
If you do not know how FreeBSD works to a detailed enough level to NOT
HAVE TO ASK THIS, then you should MAKE WORLD. You should NOT try to
do incremental recompiles. That is reserved for those people
On Fri, Feb 26, 1999 at 09:16:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
(about union mounts on 3.1 not returning all files with an 'ls' in 3.1
while it did in 3.0)
Is it sorrect that this magic is implemented in sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c?
The odd thing is that AFAICS no-one has made significant changes
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Jos Backus wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 12:09:03PM +0300, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
Inline functions in vm/vm_zone.h depend on INVARIANTS. These functions
used in msdosfs and in other parts of the kernel.
OK, I see.
How does one add INVARIANTS
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 05:08:57PM +0100, Jos Backus wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 04:16:26PM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote:
Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing...
It _is_ a bad thing. I've been pondering what to do with the
intrusive invariant checks - make them dependent
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 06:15:06PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 1999 at 9:24:31 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
If I have a /etc/defaults/rc.conf, then my /etc/rc.conf won't be consulted.
Wrong. You need to read just a bit FURTHER into that file before
jumping to
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 12:58:39PM +0100, andrea wrote:
HI
I have a trouble with FreeBSD 2.1.5
This an example of the type of question one DOES NOT ANSWER in
freebsd-current. Instead, send a polite note to the poster telling
him to send his question to questi...@freebsd.org, along with a
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 09:46:06AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
(2) never question the intentions of a committer particularly
on a mailing list.
Do NOT follow this rule. We should all be questioned.
Eivind.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 08:34:28PM -0500, Gary D. Margiotta wrote:
Hello,
Don't mean to be a pest, or a PITA by asking this, but is the 3.1 branch
still scheduled for the middle of this month? I haven't seen much on the
list recently about it, but probably haven't been paying enough
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 08:14:55PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
This does not make any operational change except to get rid
of the $conf_dir junk from rc.conf, which I originally put
in to try to bootstrap rc.diskless.
A much better way to do rc.diskless was suggested to me,
I'm moving this to FreeBSD-arch, due to taking the discussion quite a
bit in that direction.
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 11:44:35AM -0800, Sean Eric Fagan wrote:
In article
29763.917434096.kithrup.freebsd.curr...@critter.freebsd.dk you
write:
The biggest impact of this is a new argument to the
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 12:05:04PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 20:01:23 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
I can't imagine how unnecessary parens are going to improve
readability for anyone who knows his/her operator precedence.
What about the others?
I'd like to
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 09:12:07PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote:
I was thinking about the DIAGNOSTICS replacement macros and
had a random thought...
Suppose you're sitting in front of a ddb (or better yet gdb) prompt
because your kernel has just crashed due to who knows what reason.
What do
24 matches
Mail list logo
