Re: android bsd connectivity tools etc ?

2014-08-13 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/13/14 19:47, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hi, Any tips for Android / FreeBSD BSD tools for connectivity etc ? I just got a Samsung Galaxy Note 3, with Android 4.4.2 kernel 3.4.0 [...] Any URLs, tips, comments welcome, Thanks Cheers, Julian audio/gmtp from ports does the job for me (Samsung

Re: RFT vidcontrol for vt(4)

2014-05-12 Thread George Mitchell
On 05/12/14 11:25, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: [...] Is there any reason not to have kbdmux be mandatory at this point? [...] Does this mean mandatory in the sense that the kbdmux driver always gets built and loaded, or that the kbdmux driver must always be in operation (treating all

Re: Hello fdclose

2014-03-22 Thread George Mitchell
On 03/21/14 20:51, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com writes: It does serve a useful purpose, though, which is why it has endured. If you were to have a man page that said ‘Putc(3) returns …’ then the automated tools (and web links) that find Putc.3 wouldn’t be able to since

Re: cron(8) improvement

2013-11-10 Thread George Mitchell
On 11/09/13 21:23, Allan Jude wrote: On 2013-11-09 21:13, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 9 November 2013 17:58, Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com wrote: Well, if the rc.conf config is specific to the daemon being installed by the package, then the existing /etc/rc.conf.d/ system works fine, it just

Re: make buildworld

2013-10-22 Thread George Mitchell
On 10/22/13 20:55, Mateusz Guzik wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 07:49:21PM -0500, Saul A. Peebsen wrote: OK, here's a bit of history of this box. Never wanted to run CURRENT, but had no choice, STABLE wouldn't boot. So I followed all the advice how to disable all debugging features. Now I'm

Re: rcs

2013-10-09 Thread George Mitchell
On 10/09/13 03:20, Hans Ottevanger wrote: On 10/08/13 04:31, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base? The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their technical case. Technically it is quite simple: I need RCS to

Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base

2013-10-07 Thread George Mitchell
On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc becasue it is just there +1 Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-29 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/25/13 04:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/24/13 20:21, George Mitchell wrote: Setting hw.usb.dwc_otg.debug to any value greater than 0 generates an unending stream of debug output and effectively locks up the chip scrolling the output on the display. Perhaps there are some specific

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-27 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/25/13 19:20, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/25/13 04:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/24/13 20:21, George Mitchell wrote: Setting hw.usb.dwc_otg.debug to any value greater than 0 generates an unending stream of debug output and effectively locks up the chip scrolling the output

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-27 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/25/13 04:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/24/13 20:21, George Mitchell wrote: Setting hw.usb.dwc_otg.debug to any value greater than 0 generates an unending stream of debug output and effectively locks up the chip scrolling the output on the display. Perhaps there are some specific

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-25 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/25/13 04:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/24/13 20:21, George Mitchell wrote: Setting hw.usb.dwc_otg.debug to any value greater than 0 generates an unending stream of debug output and effectively locks up the chip scrolling the output on the display. Perhaps there are some specific

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-24 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/24/13 02:14, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/24/13 02:44, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/23/13 07:11, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/23/13 02:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/23/13 02:29, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/22/13 07:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Give that the printer

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-23 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/23/13 02:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/23/13 02:29, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/22/13 07:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Here's the result: [...] (at which point if I type control-c to stop usbdump, the system gets a fatal kernel mode translation fault, but that's another story

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-23 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/23/13 07:11, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/23/13 02:18, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/23/13 02:29, George Mitchell wrote: On 08/22/13 07:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: Here's the result: [...] (at which point if I type control-c to stop usbdump, the system gets a fatal kernel mode

Re: Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-22 Thread George Mitchell
As I was saying a few minutes ago ... On 01/27/13 17:32, George Mitchell wrote: On 01/27/13 14:07, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [...] I need output when hw.usb.ulpt.debug=15 to say exactly. Could you ask the provider of the binaries to compile having USB_DEBUG set, also for the modules. --HPS

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-08-22 Thread George Mitchell
On 08/22/13 07:34, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On 08/22/13 13:24, George Mitchell wrote: As I was saying a few minutes ago ... On 01/27/13 17:32, George Mitchell wrote: On 01/27/13 14:07, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [...] I need output when hw.usb.ulpt.debug=15 to say exactly. Could you ask

Re: After a source upgrade from 8.3-RELEASE to r249432 (HEAD)

2013-04-16 Thread George Mitchell
On 04/15/13 20:57, Mark Johnston wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:58:26PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: It was pretty successful. All my 8.3 packages are still running very happily, though at some point I imagine I will have to update and recompile them. But ... When I press ENTER

Re: After a source upgrade from 8.3-RELEASE to r249432 (HEAD)

2013-04-16 Thread George Mitchell
On 04/15/13 20:57, Mark Johnston wrote: On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:58:26PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: It was pretty successful. All my 8.3 packages are still running very happily, though at some point I imagine I will have to update and recompile them. But ... When I press ENTER

After a source upgrade from 8.3-RELEASE to r249432 (HEAD)

2013-04-15 Thread George Mitchell
ufs:/dev/ada0s1a every time I boot. -- George Mitchell ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: After a source upgrade from 8.3-RELEASE to r249432 (HEAD)

2013-04-15 Thread George Mitchell
On 04/15/13 18:09, Sean Bruno wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 15:58 -0400, George Mitchell wrote: that does not respond to key presses on the keyboard. It times out and continues loading anyway. At this stage, I am always presented with a manual mountroot: prompt, and I have to type ufs:/dev

Re: After a source upgrade from 8.3-RELEASE to r249432 (HEAD)

2013-04-15 Thread George Mitchell
On 04/15/13 18:52, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:44 AM, George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com wrote: On 04/15/13 18:09, Sean Bruno wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 15:58 -0400, George Mitchell wrote: that does not respond to key presses on the keyboard. It times out

Re: devel/gobject-introspection failure on ARM

2013-01-28 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/28/13 05:55, Koop Mast wrote: On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 10:57 -0500, George Mitchell wrote: System: Raspberry Pi uname: r245840M (Alie Tan's image from 25 January) ports: svnversion 308518 Build dies with message sizeof(ArrayTypeBlob) is expected to be 8 but is 12. (Complete build log

devel/gobject-introspection failure on ARM

2013-01-27 Thread George Mitchell
, and we're only at 2.28.8). What's the best way to proceed? -- George Mitchell typescript.xz Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-01-27 Thread George Mitchell
, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 5 on usbus0 device_attach: ulpt1 attach returned 12 Also, an HP CM1015 attaches without a problem. What should I try next? -- George Mitchell ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-01-27 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/27/13 11:33, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 27 January 2013 17:14:55 George Mitchell wrote: System: Raspberry Pi uname: r245840M (Alie Tan's image from 25 January) By comparison, this Lexmark E120 printer attaches and prints with no difficulty on FreeBSD-9.1-RELEASE

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-01-27 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/27/13 13:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [...] Hi, I don't see any errors in the usbdump trace you sent. So we can at least rule that out. Hint: You can filter traffic using the -f option for usbdump. What does: usbconfig dump_device_desc dump_curr_config_desc output? Can you also get

Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120

2013-01-27 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/27/13 14:07, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 27 January 2013 19:24:01 George Mitchell wrote: On 01/27/13 13:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: [...] Hi, I don't see any errors in the usbdump trace you sent. So we can at least rule that out. Hint: You can filter traffic using the -f

Re: Circular port dependency

2013-01-19 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/11/13 19:41, George Mitchell wrote: On 01/11/13 03:22, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: On (10/01/2013 20:21), George Mitchell wrote: I grabbed the ports tree as of 308518, the RELEASE_9_1_0 tag. devel/libtool won't build, because it requires autom4te during the configure phase. So I put

ctfconvert again

2013-01-14 Thread George Mitchell
head as of 245422 into a different partition and tried make buildworld (ran okay) and make buildkernel (failed with the same error as before). Do I have to build an early version of head before I can build the current version of head? -- George Mitchell

Re: ctfconvert again

2013-01-14 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/14/13 18:57, George Mitchell wrote: So I updated my FreeBSD machine to 9.1-RELEASE in the hope of getting past the ctfconvert problem that causes a build of 10-CURRENT to say: ERROR: ctfconvert: failed to initialize DWARF: Unimplemented code at [dwarf_init_attr(400)] while compiling

Re: ctfconvert again

2013-01-14 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/14/13 19:21, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: George Mitchell george+free...@m5p.com To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:57 PM Subject: ctfconvert again So I updated my FreeBSD machine to 9.1-RELEASE in the hope of getting past

Re: Circular port dependency

2013-01-11 Thread George Mitchell
On 01/11/13 03:22, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: On (10/01/2013 20:21), George Mitchell wrote: I grabbed the ports tree as of 308518, the RELEASE_9_1_0 tag. devel/libtool won't build, because it requires autom4te during the configure phase. So I put BUILD_DEPENDS= autom4te:devel/autoconf in the Makefile

Circular port dependency

2013-01-10 Thread George Mitchell
, which depends on libtool. What to do? I'm running on a CURRENT build on my Raspberry Pi. -- George Mitchell ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd

Failed to initialize dwarf?

2012-12-18 Thread George Mitchell
I checked out head Sunday and now my attempt at building a kernel says: ERROR: ctfconvert: failed to initialize DWARF: Unimplemented code at [dwarf_init_attr(400)] on every module it compiles (though it seems happy enough to keep compiling). Should I just ignore this?-- George

Re: Failed to initialize dwarf?

2012-12-18 Thread George Mitchell
On 12/18/12 07:15, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-18 12:30, George Mitchell wrote: I checked out head Sunday and now my attempt at building a kernel says: ERROR: ctfconvert: failed to initialize DWARF: Unimplemented code at [dwarf_init_attr(400)] on every module it compiles (though it seems

Re: 9.0 umass problem

2012-09-18 Thread George Mitchell
On 09/18/12 13:47, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 15 January 2012 20:36:09 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Sunday 15 January 2012 18:35:59 George Mitchell wrote: I have a USB compact flash reader-writer which is normally connected to my computer all the time but rarely contains a compact