How much memory do you have? I haven't been checking code in without
testing it, but clearly my system behaves a bit differently.
Please try 207452.
Thanks,
Kip
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
At 02:21 PM 4/30/2010, K. Macy wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12
Hi Andrew,
Does FBSDID get expanded when checking out with csup?
You should see:
__FBSDID($FreeBSD: head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c 207452 2010-04-30
22:31:37Z kmacy $);
line 451 is part of a KASSERT on this version.
Cheers,
Kip
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Reilly arei...@bigpond.net.au
The current llvm-devel package is woefully out of date. Anyone wishing
to try this will need to compile the latest port.
-Kip
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
ClangBSD is a branch of FreeBSD that aims at integrating clang
(clang.llvm.org)
into
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:09 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:09:11PM +, Rui Paulo wrote:
...
Do you all have either out-of-tree modules or modules that you did not
re-build when re-compiling your kernel?
I have in-tree modules, but I tried a
I have the same panic. I'll try to revert 205266.
Yes, 205266 is the culprit.
Try updating. I've made the change a no-op until I can track the problem down.
-Kip
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:38 PM, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have the same panic. I'll try to revert 205266.
Yes, 205266 is the culprit.
Try updating. I've made the change a no-op until I can track the problem down.
Do you all have either out-of-tree modules or modules that you did
I asked BDE about the same thing off-list:
Yes, the debug options (INVARIANTS and WITNESS,
especially the latter)
slow down the kernel by a factor of 10 or so. Only
progams that don't
make many syscalls run reasonably fast. I only turn
on these options
for debugging (not often). Without them,
Should I file a PR to track this or is that overkill?
-Kip
--- Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
Thanks for working on this. I was going to try
running
a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see
what
the difference was in time
Who is the current GDB maintainer?
-Kip
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
: warning: called from
here
machine/atomic.h:234: warning: inlining failed in call
to `atomic_store_rel_int'
../../../libkern/mcount.c:242: warning: called from
here
--- Alan L. Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
k Macy wrote:
It turns that this problem is specific to AIO in
-CURRENT. I wrote
It turns that this problem is specific to AIO in
-CURRENT. I wrote a simple program that uses
the three different completion mechanisms (polling
with aio_error, polling with kevent, and using SIGIO)
to fill up a file by writing 8kb at a time to the
file and then reading 8kb at a time from the
Has anybody used AIO in conjunction with kevent?
I am seeing as much as a 12 second latency between
when I do an 8k aio_write to a file on local disk
and kevent returning its completion (I'm calling
kevent every ~20ms). Using regular writes works fine,
but this is a multi-threaded application
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
