On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:38:46PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:59:00AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37:15
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:59:00AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Sat Nov 13 10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37:15PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > i'm having an issue with www/chromium. somet
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:37:15PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i'm having an issue with www/chromium. sometimes it will completely lock up my
> system without producing a core dump. i'm running HEAD (r215102; amd64).
Core dump of the kernel or the process ?
You probably should fo
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 07:18:54AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 09/11/2010 16:05 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > Easiest would be for DRM to provide wrappers for copyin/copyout that
> > unlock, do operation and lock.
>
> I am a little bit worried about thi
On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:25:49AM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >>>
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 04:28:54PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/11/2010 16:22 Nathan Whitehorn said the following:
> >
> > The other issue is that this can be a legal thing to do. If you have taken
> > care to
> > wire the userland buffers ahead of time, there is no problem copying
> > copy
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:06:01PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >>> Kernel pag
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 08/11/2010 14:04 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> > On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >>>
> >>>
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:50:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 05/11/2010 09:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >
> > I use FreeSBD head and KDE 4 with all the bells and whistles enabled.
> > Apparently recent KDE update has enabled even more of them, because I
> > started to
> > have pani
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 10:04:13AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 03/11/2010 18:27 m...@freebsd.org said the following:
> >> It's not clear to me from the man pages (perhaps I didn't look at the
> >> right one?) in which environments I n
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:33:50PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 November 2010 19:12:14 Bruce Cran wrote:
> > I've noticed in recent months that I appear to be getting silent corruption
> > of my UFS filesystems - and I think it may be linked to using md(4) or
> > creating sparse files.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:44:58PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2010, at 3:57 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> >>>
> >>> % man ls
> >>> zcat: /usr/share/man/cat1/ls.1.gz already has .gz suffix -- unchanged
> >>> % man man
> >>> zcat: /usr/share/man/cat1/man.1.gz already has .gz su
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:55:26PM +0200, Norberto Lopes wrote:
> Hi.
> I've been taking a look at ktrace and kdump in order to get (1) familiar with
> the sources and (2) to finally try to give back something to the community.
>
> So far from what I've seen, and after reading this thread
> http
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:42:57AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> For the last week, on and off, I've been looking for something that
> caused KDE to be horridly unstable, i.e. machine freezes with and
> without a core-dump.
>
> Removing r212281 (and r212282) restores that stability. Is there a ra
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:42:57AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> For the last week, on and off, I've been looking for something that
> caused KDE to be horridly unstable, i.e. machine freezes with and
> without a core-dump.
>
> Removing r212281 (and r212282) restores that stability. Is there a ra
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> >While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
> >the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
> >(presumably the ones to profile
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:46:35PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c b/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > index 97cf234..511172a 100644
> > --- a/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > +++ b/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,6 @@ __cxa_finalize(void *dso)
> > if (dso
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:25:34PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for
> > > me. It aborts on exit (C
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for me.
> It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
>
> f...@r500 ~ $gdb emacs
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
> FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
>
> Comments welcome! I'll commit it in by the weekend if there is no
> objec
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 03:21:04PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:49:45PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> > While updating sysutils/coreutils port on -current as of this morning
> > (SVN r211550), I noted a panic during the directory rename config test.
> >
>
> Your problem
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:32:58PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > --7hK5U8dVDlZxii7z
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:47:23PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:35:55PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > > * Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > Which most likely means that fusesfs filled its own struct fileops
> &g
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:35:55PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > Which most likely means that fusesfs filled its own struct fileops
> > without properly initializing fo_truncate member.
>
> It's a bit misleading that cdevs automatically pa
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 02:58:59PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> > The uart thing is a red herring, notice the actual PC value is '0'.
> > Something
> > in kern_open() invoked a NULL function pointer. Doing 'l *kern_open+0x35'
> > in
> > kgdb would be a good start of where
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 03:35:48PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, August 20, 2010 3:19:53 pm Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > It seems nobody replied to the mdf@ objection against wait of the
> > new proc startup being equivalent to the LOR. I think that the wait
> > is s
et wrote:
> >> >> On 18 August 2010 23:11, pluknet wrote:
> >> >> > On 18 August 2010 17:46, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:43:19PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 18 Aug
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:43:19PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 12:07, pluknet wrote:
> > On 17 August 2010 20:04, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Also please take a note of the John' suggestion to use the taskqueue.
> >
> > I
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 07:42:41PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> 2010/8/16 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:07:24PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> >> On 16 August 2010 21:05, pluknet wrote:
> >> > Hi.
> >> >
> >> > Seeing on mostl
.
>
> I added a simple mmap to grep, and time-trialed it, but the mmap version
> was somewhat slower than the regular version. I understood from Kostik
> Belousov that readahead does not work properly with mmap, and it should
> not be used for "one-time" reads.
This is no
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:07:24PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> On 16 August 2010 21:05, pluknet wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Seeing on mostly idle, recently updated current, while closing a file.
> > Presumably never reported on ML.
> >
> > lock order reversal:
> > 1st 0xff00198199f8 nfs (nfs) @ /usr/s
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:23:55PM +0300, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> >
> > >> why would you want to lock a file for reading anyways?
> > >
> > > Does current bsdgrep read lock by default ?
> > > If so, it would be better off by default, enabled by an o
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 02:01:57PM +0200, Ren? Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if I understand correctly, this is what r211212 and r211213 fixes?
r211213. r211212 fixes different issue, and there is one more known
problem.
>
> Rene
>
> 2010/8/8 Rene Ladan :
> > On 18-07-2010 15:02, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 09:37:04AM +0200, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
> Dear list members,
> I tried to reproduce another bug on my test machine (i386, CURRENT
> r211175), but ran into the following deadlock:
This is not a deadlock, but the LOR. It is irrelevant for your deadlock.
Supposedly, the deadl
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:46:04PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently noticed that cv_wait_sig() will return -1
> > rather than EINTR when a SIGINT is delivered. This is
> >
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:36:24AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently noticed that cv_wait_sig() will return -1
> rather than EINTR when a SIGINT is delivered. This is
> in contrast to CONDVAR(9) which states:
>
> <...>
> cv_wait_sig() and cv_timedwait_sig() return prematur
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:14:10PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/07/2010 19:53 Gavin Atkinson said the following:
> >
> > Thanks. Can you try
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~gavin/mexas-hda-panic.diff
> >
> > and see if that solves things for you?
> >
> > (Credit goes to avg@ for looking in
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> Reposting from -stable.
>
> Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to
> break a few servers.
>
> This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance
> to test it. It is directly based off
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:58:00AM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> With newest -HEAD code, firefox is stuck in getbuf().
>
> top
>
> last pid: 1814; load averages: 0.00, 0.05, 0.07
>
> up 0+00:37:11 10:54:01
> 135 processes: 1 running, 134 sleeping
> CPU:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:05:26PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >When intr time starts accumulating again, try to do
> >"procstat -kk " and correlate the clock thread tid
> >with the backtrace. Might be, it helps
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:06:06PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/18/10 12:41, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:21:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 07/18/10 03:30, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:14:41AM -0700, Do
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:21:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/18/10 03:30, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:14:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >>> Run top in the mode where
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 01:14:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >Run top in the mode where all system threads are shown separately
> >(e.g. top -HS seems to do it), then watch what thread eats the processor.
>
> And the wi
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:10:26PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> >This doesn't indicate any problem. I suggest you try to figure out what
> >interrupt is causing this by adding printfs or disabling drivers one by
> >one.
>
> I've no idea where to even beg
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 02:25:26PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 11/07/2010 15:23 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 11/07/2010 14:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> >> For completeness, here is a patch that simply drops the inline assembly
> >> and the
> >> comment about it, and GCC-gen
Hi,
on the HEAD r209908, I see a lot of LORs at the boot. It seems that
mutex called "ATA state lock" is held over the large period of kernel
initialization. After the system booted, it seems to operate properly.
atapci0: port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xc000-0xc00f at device 1.1 on pc
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:26:26PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Kostik,
>
> On 06/07/2010, at 22:33 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > "Install evolution-data-server" as a reference to the command is a sure way
> > to not get any help.
>
> Why, becaus
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 01:47:18PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 06.07.2010 10:54, schrieb Kostik Belousov:
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> >> Please help: read PR bin/147175 and comment if you're knowledgeable about
&g
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:20:28AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> it appears that some change to -RECENT (relative to 8-STABLE) breaks
> linking several GSSAPI applications from ports, for instance,
> mail/fetchmail if GSSAPI is enabled.
>
> These applications then compile OK,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:12:13AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> every now and then, for fun I run up a chroot of freebsd 1.1. or 1.0
> under a chroot. Usually hillarity ensues with teh 15 second kernel
> compile and the 4 minute make world.
>
> in -current I can't do that any more.. any bina
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 08:38:37PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I noticed on my i386 router running 9-CURRENT that the "debug.ncores" sysctl
> appears to get its value from some kernel memory that gets updated frequently:
>
> debug.ncores: -936629388
>
> On line 2967 of sys/kern/kern_sig.c should
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:26:19AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
> TB --- 2010-06-18 03:09:26 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 201
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:00:00PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I got the attached ZFS LORs when building ports on a new install of
> 9.0-CURRENT-20100610-JPSNAP. I know there have been some ZFS checkins in the
> last few days so I don't know if they've already been fixed?
The LORs are not specific
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 11:41:09AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 30 May 2010 11:06:22 am Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabl
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:46:54AM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/01/10 09:25, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote:
> [snip interesting history]
>
> >I do suggest modifying the FreeBSD build process so that uname -a shows
> >the compiler and its version for both the kernel and userland.
>
> Read
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:55:17AM -0500, Astrodog wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Roman Divacky wrote:
> >> > people are already experimenting with clang installed from ports,
> >> > with gcc4.{3,4,5} from ports etc. by not importing clang we can
> >> > maybe delay this a little but it'
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:24:52PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:56:17PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:03:17AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > > On May 30, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > On S
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:03:17AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> On May 30, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision 104832 which is
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:55:39PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> I just found that if I disable "AES NI" in BIOS setting, FreeBSD would
> be able to detect it on boot with:
>
> Features2=0x29ee3ff,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,POPCNT,AESNI>
>
> However
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 06:30:35PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Not long ago, POSIX semaphores support was enabled by default as it's
> becoming more widely used, by e.g. firefox. However, the support
> for these is still incomplete: we only have systemwide limit of 30
> semaphores, an
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi,
>
> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision 104832 which is what we
> aim to import into HEAD in roughly a week. We would like the initial
It was promised that before the import, the public discussion on
the mailing list will
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:54:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/26/10 09:51, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >I did a quick glance over the driver, try this:
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/nvidia-vm_page_lock.1.patch
> >I did not even compiled the patched driver.
&
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:41:51PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >>Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribl
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
> >broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
> >at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken as well with the
> >sa
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 06:58:56PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> In my usage, it works good by the patch appended to this mail.
The patch is probably a start in the right direction. But, it would be
much better to install sys/i386/include to e.g. /usr/include/machine
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:30:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:04:01PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > please find at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/aesni.1.patch the
> > combined patch, containing the fpu_kern K
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:04:36PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 01:04:01PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > I am interested in the problem reports and reviews. Maintainers of
> > !x86-oids are welcome to provide feedback whether they feel that
&
Hello,
please find at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/aesni.1.patch the
combined patch, containing the fpu_kern KPI and Intel AESNI crypto(9)
driver. I did development and some testing on the hardware generously
provided by Sentex Communications to Netperf cluster.
I already posted the kern_
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:55:35AM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As was revealed in a recent thread here [1], several people have been
> unable to use kgdb on coredumps for the past few months (but possibly not
> everyone).
>
> I am one of those affected, and have narrowed the brea
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:05:06PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Kostik Belousov writes:
> > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes:
> > > It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP.
> > No, it does not. Essentially, it adds one or two function calls per
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 04:37:51PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> The recent lzma import has enabled libarchive's lzma support. However,
> it have come to our attention that building -HEAD on earlier FreeBSD
> versions (specifically, 7.x after
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:33:00PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> Ivan Voras writes:
> > Just wondering - does the quota code have that much impact on the file
> > system that it's still today left out of the GENERIC kernel?
>
> It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP. I h
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:00:32PM -0700, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
>
> [r...@test ~]# uname -a
> FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT
> 2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:58:32PM +0200, Ulrich Sp??rlein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fairly recent -CURRENT, system uptime is 7 min (yeah, it's crashing a
> lot lately) and I'm pushing stuff with rsync, but see the TIME column:
>
> last pid: 2013; load averages: 1.39, 0.74, 0.41 up 0+00:07:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 09:19:53AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> This was during the single- to multi-user transition on boot; I was
> going to skip the output from the LORs, but I suspect that some of
> them might be relevant; see below.
>
> I can leave the system in this state for a whle, but
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:43:49PM +0400, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ehh, looks like fresh kernel is not too stable, it holds after some time
> of activity.
>
> DDB may be activated, but even 'call cpu_reset' does nothing here.
>
> Looks like it is not related to SUJ, it happens even
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:32:41PM +0200, Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:40:24AM +1100, Dima Panov wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 April 2010 23:16:38 Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > > According to Dima Panov:
> > > > while building lang/ruby18:
> > > Which options to you use?
> > >
> >
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 03:44:37PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/11/10 12:20 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:13:12PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>On 4/11/10 11:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:23:33A
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:13:12PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/11/10 11:44 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:23:33AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>On 4/11/10 3:27 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >>>I already pointed in
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:23:33AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/11/10 3:27 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >I already pointed in the other reply in this thread, $ORIGIN dynamic
> >token should solve the issue. See
> >http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1984/ch
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:45:20PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> >On 4/10/10 12:07 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>[1] Actually, PBI might work just fine even for
> >>embedded if we address the disk bloat issue. One
> >>approach would be to make
> >>/Package/Bar/libfoo-2.8.7.so
On Sun, Apr 04, 2010 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I noticed my mini-ITX box (runnning -CURRENT) has been printing quite a few
> "npxdna in kernel mode!" messages recently, so I added KDB support to find
> out
> where they were coming from. The stack trace I got was:
>
> npxdna in ke
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:40:07AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> >...
> >I am not a FAT expert and I know to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt.
> >But please take a look at this:
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#Boot_Sector
> >
> >I
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 01:49:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:39:51PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:39:07PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > [55]Please.tell.me.who.am.I# gdb /usr/sbin/named named.core
> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> > Copyright
201 - 284 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
