Re: Problem on installing BSD 5.x on laptop ...

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Damien Touraine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : How could I get my 3CCFEM556BI work during the install process of FreeBSD ? I don't think that you can. I've not been able to get that card working locally on a non-install kernel (well, a similar card). The

Re: Problems with pcmcia on 5.1-RELEASE

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christian Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : pccard0: (manufacturer=0x, product=0x) at function 0 : pccard0:CIS info: FREECOM, PCCARD-IDE, REV836 Looks like we need another entry in ata-card.c for this device. I've added this to

Re: Patch review

There's no need to add an extra parameter. I like Matt Dodd's proposed patch better. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: -pedantic yet again, this time with Werror

H, when I build, I get: ===> libexec/tcpd cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -DREAL_DAEMON_DIR=\"/usr/libexec\" -DSEVERITY=LOG_INFO -DRFC931_TIMEOUT=10 -DHOSTS_DENY=\"/etc/hosts.deny\" -DHOSTS_ALLOW=\"/etc/hosts.allow\" -DFACILITY=LOG_DAEMON -DINET6 -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror

Re: Compiling under 5.x for 4.x releases?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Thanks; I guess that means that for now I keep the production build machine : is 4.8-STABLE, and I keep 5.x as a "play" environment until people move : over. I think, but am not positive, that 4.8-stable boxes

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

TB --- 2003-06-14 17:43:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 It looks like we were racing here. I committed my changes at 17:41:59, which is well within the margin of error depending on when the local repo was updated. Warner ___ [EMAIL PR

Re: *IT WORKS* Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD)

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 14:17, Tony Naggs wrote: : > Yes, I think you should also do this for Uhci. There are probably not : > many straight Uhci USB 1.1 Cardbus cards, but it is likely some of the : > USB 2.0 car

Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD)

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: : > I recently purchased a generic CompUSA branded CardBus USB 2.0 : > controller for a challenge to try to get it to work under FreeBSD ;) It : > ap

Re: Correct PCI suspend and resume operations

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:15:05PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: : > > AFAICT, we don't common code for handling this and maybe there should : > > be some rather than have each driver replicate this behaviour. :

Re: Correct PCI suspend and resume operations

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Orion Hodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : It looks like the pci configuration space state has been lost during : the suspend and resume. This may be because the bus has removed power : from the devices attached to it on suspend. During a suspend, devic

Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Justin T. Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > I'm thinking that the loop should be more like: : > : > pcifunchigh = 0; : > f = 0; : > hdrtype = REG(PCIR_HEADERTYPE, 1); : > if (hdrtype & 0x7f > 2) : >

Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thomas Moestl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, 2003/06/10 at 16:41:44 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: : > Thomas Moestl wrote this message on Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 01:02 +0200: : > > On Tue, 2003/06/10 at 15:34:36 -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: : > > T

Re: Correct PCI suspend and resume operations

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:44:36AM -0700, Orion Hodson wrote: : > It looks like the pci configuration space state has been lost during : > the suspend and resume. This may be because the bus has removed power

Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 01:56:15PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: : > On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:46:21PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > > I'm thinking that th

Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:58:38PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: : > Hello, : > : > I've recently started work on making FreeBSD work better on a sparc64 : > box that a friend has. It's a Netra AX1105-500 (Ult

Re: PCI bus numbering and orphaned devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > > +#ifdef __sparc64__ : > > + /* : > > + * XXX - some sparc hardware has valid hardware when the : > > + * function 0 doesn't probe. Scan all functions. : > > + */ : > >

Re: mini-PCI Cards dont work

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torsten Kötting) writes: : Interesting was that the Orinoco card was'nt found when i was using my : custom-mini kernel which had all the PC-Card stuff disabled. I thought the : accessability of the mini-PCI slot doesnt depend on any PC-

Re: mini-PCI Cards dont work

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torsten Kötting) writes: : Its a Cisco Aironet 350. The driver does find the card but when I activate : its interface an0 I get a timeout message, the cpu-load jumps to 100% and I : need to reset the laptop. These are classic interrupt

Re: 4.8 -> 5.0-CURRENT build error

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Evan S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : # make : building shared library libkse.so.1 : thr_libc.So: In function `sigaction': : thr_libc.So(.text+0x54): multiple definition of `_sigaction' : thr_sigaction.So(.text+0x0): first defined here : thr_libc.So: In

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > + WORLDTMP=${WORLDTMP} CSTD= \ : : may. This seems to mostly work... I'm trying to sort out a couple of other issues, but those may be related to other changes that I've made in my test tree. W

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > First off, I'd like to say that's my understanding as well. : : That was not my understanding at all. The last time it came it, it was specifically stated that it was until the branch point. But so far th

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: : > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: : > > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: : > > : > > -std=gnu99 : > >

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On 6/6/2003 9:29 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: : > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:17:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : >> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> Bernd

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I already wondered how you could route interrupts without ACPI until I : booted my printserver with a recent kernel. PCIBIOS! Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lis

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:36:54PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : I have a sm

Re: [PATCH] Tweak re-routing of PCI interrupts

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I have a small tweak to the PCI code that re-routes PCI interrupts. : Basically, it does two things, 1) make the comment less ia64-specific : and 2) if the interrupt route returns an invalid IRQ (i.e. 255), then

Re: ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

I think we're getting close to convincing ourselves that we need to do this all the time... It is the same as the patch that jhb has been circulating. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Re: [acpi-jp 2311] ACPI and PCI vs interrupt routing on Sony VAIO's

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm currently working on making the PCI interrupt routing work for SMP : and once that is done I plan to commit a change to make this : : #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__i386__) : : However, if people find t

Re: s4bios

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Have you tried doing that or don't you have the need for it? No space for it on my disk, or I'd do it. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebs

Re: s4bios

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Is there anyone that has succesfully used "acpiconf -s 4"? Fails on my Dell i8000, but that's because I don't have a suspend partition. My Fiva 205 works great, except for one or two minor problems on restore

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The possible methods available in an interface are fixed, they're : defined in the .m files. No it isn't. One can add additional interfaces at any time without breaking binary compatibility, so you don't know,

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Doug, am I missing something? I think we can have more than 256 methods, en toto, since any object can implement multiple interface types and we don't know, a-priori, how many different interfaces a given objec

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm not sure that kobj actually needs to be MP safe if the kobj : struct is always embedded in a structure at a higher level i.e. : a use of kobj in say the device driver code will not interact with : it's use b

Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : You should look at kobj, it's precisely this sort of dynamic : dispatching that it was designed to support. Too bad it is a little slow and not MP safe in its implementation. Warner ___

Re: OpenOffice-devel: repeatable coredump with sun autodoc inlibstd++

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm still working to get OpenOffice1.1Beta2 ready, but am now stuck with : a segfault. The compile currently aborts on many places where -frtti is : used, so everybody is using -fno-rtti these days. But here I ge

Re: viapropm doesnt like sys/dev/pci.c rev 1.214

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David P. Reese Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Is it my chipset's fault for not reading back the correct register value? : The board is a SOYO K7VTAPRO-2AA6. What other info would be helpful in : this situation? It appears that there's some non-zero

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Jumping in a bit late as I thought someone would point this out, but : I thought that 3rd-party modules would live in /boot/modules? third party binary only modules. If you have source, for some definition of h

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, 28 May 2003 18:39, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > : Maybe the kernel build stuff can look in /usr/local/src/sys/modules : > : > : for things to bu

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : You need 'FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=' in the install target. True. : 1) If the port is updated between builds you end up with two version of the : port installed. True. That's a weakness in the ports system, w

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, 28 May 2003 15:29, Q wrote: : > By doing that aren't you assuming that the kernel will be installed on : > the machine that built it, and not potentially somewhere else? What : > about sysinstall upg

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, 28 May 2003 14:41, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > : > "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: Kernel module inconsistency was policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexey Neyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'd rather see something like : PORTS_KMODS=audio/aureal-kmod xxx/yyy : knob in the /etc/make.conf Funny, I had similar thoughts before seeing your patch. Here's my latest patch. You could put it in /etc/make

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Maybe the kernel build stuff can look in /usr/local/src/sys/modules for things : to build or something.. YUCK! Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://

Re: policy on GPL'd drivers?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The only downside is that there are no hooks into the build process so you : have to be VERY careful when you update your kernel, or you get panics :( This is true. I'd thought that MODULES_OVERRIDE would

Re: connect(2) behavior with unreacheable hosts

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Why does not connect(2) return any error when trying to connect to a host : unreachable because of an infinite loop in the routes? No time-out occurs and : the value 0 is returned by connect(2). Hm, you are correct. I w

Re: device puc on non-i386 or with parallel devices

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm currently working on updating the hardware release notes to reflect : reality. the puc device is currently only in the i386 section of the : release notes, however I am under the impression people are succe

Re: Integer Exception/5-CURRENT/cbb related

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:536 536 if ((ih->ih_flags & IH_MPSAFE) == 0) This is very odd. It doesn't make any sense. Warner

Re: ACPI using too much CPU on idle system

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 01:20:40PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: : > top -S shows the following on my machine: : > : > CPU states: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 80.3% system, 12.9% interrupt, 6.1% idle : > : > PID

Re: Updated pci/if_* attach patches

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : * Add bus_child_present check to calls to *_stop in the detach method for : devices that have children (i.e. miibus). bus_child_present isn't quite right for this. bus_child_present means "this child is still th

Re: unrecognized Prism III card

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Michael W . Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Hi folks, : : I picked up a couple of no-name Prism III cards, and found that : FreeBSD-current doesn't recognize them. Is there anything I can do to : make these work? (Up to and including shipping a c

Linux emulation busted

I had a working Linux world on my laptop. I upgraded my kernel and acroread4 stopped working. Now all I get is: Exited with error code: 0x400e0009. after a whole lot of disk access when I try to run it. This worked on a December kernel for sure. I'm pretty sure it was working as late as a Jan

Re: "Just" building the lib part of world

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Or even better would be just building libc. I have been working on my : getpwnam_r assignment... : examining implementations in both Darwin and NetBSD and started trying : to implement some of : this code fo

[no subject]

devd_enable=yes would be a good start. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Updated if_* attach/detach patches

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : - dc: move interrupt allocation back where it was before. It was unnecessary : to move it Why's that? If dc is on a shared interrupt line, then dc_intr is going to be called, potentially, before the rest of t

Re: wi driver

I've just committed the right fix for this (which is to nuke the bogus KASSERT). I have one or two other fixes in the pipe for lucent cards, but had hoped to get them 'perfect' rather than 'a lot better' before committing them. Since my time has been short, I'll go ahead and try to commit the 'be

Re: wi driver

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Sam Leffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > * Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030316 21:19] wrote: : > > um.. : > > : > ... : > 840 _FLAGS_OUTRANGE) { : > 841 WI_UNLOCK(sc); : > 842 return; : > 843

Re: FBSD 5.0 diskless environment does not work!

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Hartmann, O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Can anyone help? Has someone a runnng diskless FBSD 5.0-R/5-CURRENT : environment? I fixed a couple of bugs in the /etc/rc.d files that broke diskless boots about a month or two so after 5.0-RELEASE. It would

Re: Fix for rtc, vmware modules and post-500104 -current

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :driver "vmmon" used unreserved major device number 200 Actually, major numbers 200-253 are 'reserved for local use' and shouldn't be assigned autmatically. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR

Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version

De: Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-03-05 ] [ Subjecte: Re: Removal of netns - politically correct version ] > On the other hand, there's no compelling reason to dike it out, > if it can be made to work. I would argue that ISA support is > more or less just as obsolete, as i

Re: HEADSUP: Driver mega-commit ahead.

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : This particular sweep gives os much better cross-branch source : portability and therefore I think it is exactly the kind of thing : we want before the RELENG_5 branch. I for one plan on MFC'ing the "NULL

Re: old serial RS-232 pccard and wi driver.

Can you run a small test? Can you build a kernel w/o wi? Further, can you do sysctl hw.pccard.cis_debug=1 before you insert the card (or put the hw=1 part in /boot/loader.conf) and send me the result? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre

Re: TI WiFi Drivers

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Suneel Jhangiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Does anyone know if someone is working on WiFi drivers for cards based : on the TI chipset running at 22Mbps (ie. D-link DWL-650+ pcmcia card)? 22Mbps isn't WiFi. It is Ti's own proprietary thing that 80

Re: wi0 - need help

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality? : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now... I'm planning on doing that soonish. However, I think that hacking wi to make it

Re: wi0 - need help

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Christoph P. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Warner, I applied the patch and no change. marcel's patch, or my patch? : How does one specify the commands in the ifconfig interface? : This is what I used to invoke from /etc/rc.local: : : /usr/sb

Re: wi0 - need help

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > status: no carrier : > ssid "" 1:"" : : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old wicontrol interface when the commands are also present in the

Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: : >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes: : : >I personally think that we should not support the 80386 in 5.x. : >However when that has been brought up before there were a lot of : >theoretical

Re: No more new majors, and help loose the old ones...

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > Please help remove entries in sys/conf/majors for which there exists : > no software, and convert drivers to use "MAJOR_AUTO" instead of using : > static major numbers. : : What is a good driver to crib this fr

Re: [patch] wi: device timeout

Hmmm. This patch looks backwards to me, but I'll take a look at it. I'm also worried about the 'heart-beat' status querries that we do to the hardware in an timeout context might interrupt other, legit commands causing confusion. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsub

Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Garance A Drosihn wrote: : > I'm thinking maybe the 5.x release CD's should include: : > GENERIC : > GENERIC +SMP : > GENERIC +VMWARE-friendly settings : > GENERIC fo

Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm thinking maybe the 5.x release CD's should include: : GENERIC : GENERIC +SMP : GENERIC +VMWARE-friendly settings : GENERIC for i386 : : Would that add too much extra work for a 5.x r

Re: Sis chipset

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x chip=0x802910ec rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 : > vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor' : > device = 'RTL8029 NE2000 compatible Ethernet' : > class= n

Re: wi0: tx failed, retry limit exceeded

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "C. Kukulies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : I moved my server to new hardware and upgraded to 5.0-current ( 3 weeks ago) : pppoe and my ADSL link is up and running since yesterday but my : local wireless home network still refuses to work. I have a PCI

Re: WLAN

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gerald Mixa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : does anybody know wether FreeBSD supports PCMCIA cards for wireless : lan based on 802.11g (54MBit/s) standard? Nope. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 Makefile

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:24:48 -0700 (MST) : "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : > In message: : > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "James E. Flemer&q

Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 Makefile

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "James E. Flemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : There are some non-if_* modules in there now that seem to : be only documented in /usr/src, exca is a good example. exca is there just for the pleasure of cbb (and soon pcic)... No one would load it on the

Re: Cardbus-attached USB controller

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bob Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Would someone like to give me a clue how to plumb this thing in? TIA Index: ohci_pci.c === RCS file: /cache/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/ohci_pci.c,v retriev

Re: IRDA - ACPI (Battery)

: Since APCI is now used instead of APM, I'm wondering if we have to wait/program : softwares to control the battery status ? I use the apm command :-). The acpi code provides enough of the apm API to allow apm and apmd to work. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs

Re: Local repo: Perforce/CVS integration

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mathieu Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : This does not answer to the question :) p4 changes -m 10 Change 25340 on 2003/02/17 by importer@updater 'Import at Mon Feb 17 11:05:36 P' ... importer is the magic behind the scenes. Warner To Unsubscribe:

Re: The cbus driver for pc98

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > :

Re: The cbus driver for pc98

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: : >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : >: Takahashi Yoshihiro &l

Re: The cbus driver for pc98

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > I can understand if you do not like to call your cbus hardware "ISA" : > devices, but also consider that on most pc-at hardwar

Re: The cbus driver for pc98

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > I have had some questions like "Does PC98 have ISA bus?" or "Why PC98 : > uses ISA driver?". To clear these questions and problems, I think : > that add

Re: The cbus driver for pc98

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Takahashi Yoshihiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I have made the cbus driver for pc98 based on i386 isa driver. This : completely removes that PC98 depends on isa driver and also corrects : directory layouts (pc98/i386 -> pc98/pc98 and pc98/pc98 -> pc98

Re: sys/pci/if* fixes

One thing: you don't need to move the allocation of the interrupt, just the turning it on. However, if you move the location that you turn it on be careful that the driver doesn't do something silly in its attach routine. I was wrong a while ago when I said that the attach routines typically turn

Re: sys/pci/if* fixes

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : * Does each device that uses miibus need to explicitly call : device_delete_child when it is detaching? Should it do it also in its : attach routine if it encounters an error? I assume all drivers need to do : t

Re: sys/pci/if* fixes

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: : > Also, except for xl, all drivers have a common cleanup on error in : > attach that backs out allocated resources with no assumptions about the : > order they were

Re: firewire hangs on Thinkpad

shimokawa-san, This sounds like an interrupt storm of some sort. There are indications from other sources that there may be an interrupt in the cardbus bridge that isn't being properly cleared for reasons as yet unknown. It doesn't seem to happen on all the machines, since my laptop is u

Re: firewire hangs on Thinkpad

P.S. With full debugs hw.cbb.debug: 1 hw.cardbus.debug: 1 hw.cardbus.cis_debug: 1 hw.pccard.debug: 1 hw.pccard.cis_debug: 1 I see the following sequence of events in my /var/log/messages: Feb 9 09:52:35 hammer sudo: imp : TTY=ttyp1 ; PWD=/dell/imp ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/kldload if_rl

Re: syslog bug

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : syslog(3) botches things if you pass it a string that has "%%m" in it. : this should fix it, any comments? : : Index: syslog.c : === : RCS file

Re: Question about devd concept

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : fine. Any ideas? Thanks for the info! I've sent in a different message that I think will fix this problem. The problem is that /usr/local isn't mounted when devd starts, so /usr/local/etc/netconf/bin/ne

Re: Question about devd concept

Consider the following patch. Since you have custom configuration, it might rely on other parts of the system being active before they will work. This patch moves devd from starting 'first' to starting before we have to mount the 'critical' remote disks. If you require critical remote disks to d

Re: Question about devd concept

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I ran into a similar problem, actually -- programs like dhclient rely on : being able to write to lease and pid files. It's almost as though we'd : like an additional set of events when the system is "more boot

Re: Question about devd concept

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 19:20:12 +0100 : > From: Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : > : > Hi, : > : > I'm currently experimenting with 5-CURRENT on my Notebook an have a

Re: Question about devd concept

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Hi, : : I'm currently experimenting with 5-CURRENT on my Notebook an have a : question regarding the concept of devd. : : With 4-STABLE I had pccardd running. Whenever a pccard was inserted I : had pccar

Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms".

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Alpha has multiple platforms, but it has not been made explicit. : pc98 is an alternate platform for i386. And we have PowerPC and : mips. Keep in mind that for mips you have two different architectures: mip

Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms".

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : general theme. Thus (in this case), ARCH=mips and MACH=algor or : MACH=sgimips... Actually, NetBSD uses MACHINE_ARCH=mipsel for little endian machines and MACHINE_ARCH=mips for big endian machines. However,

Re: Patch to teach config(8) about "platforms".

Any reason why the NetBSD approach to this problem won't work? IMHO, the meta-port should drive the derived ports. The static parts of the system are radically different between the different mips platforms. Using the endian.h stuff as an example: src/sys/arch/arc/include/endian.h is just "#inc

Re: firewire hangs on Thinkpad

This sounds like it might be an interrupt storm. I'm not sure if the fwohci driver is failing to clear an interrupt source, or if the cardbus bridge is failing. Have you connected a fw device to the firewire card? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-c

Re: psm0 not found on a Sony Vaio w/ 5.0-RELEASE

In message: Ben Hockenhull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I recently installed 5.0-RELEASE on a Sony Vaio R505EC laptop and it's : working pretty well, save for the fact that i can run X because my touchpad : isn't found upon boot probe. : : It use

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >