Re: Intel Etherexpress support?

2000-10-31 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 10:57:11AM +0100, Gerhard Sittig wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 00:08 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: Without looking at any of your code, I would kindly like to ask you not to look at the Linux driver for eexpress too much - it's severely broken and has all kinds

Re: Intel Etherexpress support?

2000-10-30 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:58:28AM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Glendon Gross wrote: Is it possible to use the old Intel EtherExpress-16 cards with FreeBSD? The driver was broken a while back and I'm right in the middle of trying to fix it. I've actually given up on

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg port: both duds

2000-10-09 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 12:37:30AM +, attila! wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- on Sun, 8 Oct 2000 11:46:47 +0200, Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Actually, mailwrapper (I don't know about this mailcap thing, I'm only running STABLE right now for lack of machines

Re: port tree clean?

2000-10-09 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:52:37AM +0800, Donny Lee wrote: Hi there, is port tree back for cvsup? Yes. Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks '/ignore-ance is bliss' - me To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: POSTFIX-- Wietse: tweak and go! --pkg port: both duds

2000-10-08 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 07:02:12AM +, attila! wrote: [snip] (o) CAUTION: 'make world' reinstalls 'sendmail' even when NO_SENDMAIL=YES # do not build sendmail and related programs is included in '/etc/make.conf'; 'make world' may not compile sendmail, but it

Re: #include struct.h in sys/queue.h

2000-10-02 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 10:10:39AM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: This breaks several other ports (like BitchX). I think this breaks all IRC's which are cloned from the same origin :-) I'm still looking for the downside to this. ;-) 'HEY!' ;P Greetz, Peter -- dataloss networks

Re: superduperopen(3) (was: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you!)

2000-09-17 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 10:04:47AM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote: crazy mode on How much sense does it make to think about implementing tee and select methods this way? Like "open file1 and file2 and write to both of them whatever I give to you" and "give me data coming in from whatever

Re: Fdescfs updates--coming to a devfs near you!

2000-09-14 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [snip] The majority of these programs could be handled by adding knowledge of "-" as a magic filename to fopen(3). At the same time I would really love if we implemented "|.*" to mean "do an popen(3)" instead. Heh, and

Re: FIFOs select: what about our implementation?

2000-09-05 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:50:56PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Consider this comment comes from screen(1): /* * Define this if your system exits select() immediatly if a pipe is * opened read-only and no writer has opened it. */ #define BROKEN_PIPE 1 We have broken(?) pipe,

Re: FIFOs select: what about our implementation?

2000-09-05 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 12:44:33AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: [snip] Please consider that we talk not about reads but about select. 'Select' is used to indicate that data is available while 'read' used to read it, they are two different things and behaviour of one thing not related to