On Apr 02, 2014 04:54 PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 4/2/14, Oliver Pinter oliver.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/31/14, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 31, 2014 02:07 AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 3/22/14, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
First off, I hope
On Mar 31, 2014 02:07 AM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 3/22/14, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
First off, I hope that even as a non-committer, it's okay that I post
a call for testing. If not, please excuse my newbishness in this
process. This is my first time submitting
follow my progress on GitHub:
https://github.com/lattera/freebsd (branch: soldierx/lattera/aslr).
Thank you very much,
Shawn Webb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
Hey All,
Stupid bug report. I just updated my source tree today. Last update was 03
Jan 2014. Sometime between then and now was a commit that killed my mouse
in Xorg. My Xorg was configured to use hald/dbus (and I'll be testing
switching over to devd soon). I'm not sure which commit broke the
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
Stupid bug report. I just updated my source tree today. Last update was 03
Jan 2014. Sometime between then and now was a commit that killed my mouse
in Xorg. My Xorg was configured to use hald/dbus (and I'll
So I have unbound running in a vnet jail. Doing a lookup with `host` is
pretty responsive, but Chromium's lookups are extremely slow (taking around
30 seconds to resolve). I'm running pretty much a stock config. I've tried
turning off DNSSEC, but that doesn't help any. I have num-threads set to 4,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.orgwrote:
stage 3.2: building everything
[...]
^
/src/sys/sys/sdt.h:153:19: note: expanded from macro 'SDT_PROBE_DEFINE'
struct sdt_probe sdt_##prov##_##mod##_##func##_##name[1] = {
\
I'm getting a build error as well, but on 9-STABLE under Poudriere.
Relevant part of the logfile:
In file included from
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-4.0.5.2/sc/source/core/tool/scmatrix.cxx:34:
In file included from /usr/local/include/mdds/multi_type_matrix.hpp:31:
Not to spam my site or anything, but I blog pretty regularly about stuff I
find fun on FreeBSD at http://0xfeedface.org/. If anyone wants an account
to start blogging there, that'd be pretty cool.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yeah, the trouble is that
Hey All,
I'm on r249745 on amd64. For the past few weeks, my box hasn't been able to
completely turn off or reboot. The box sits at the console at the All
buffers synced message. I'm running root on ZFS in a two-disk mirror
setup. No kernel panics or dumps or anything.
Let me know if there's
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
CAn you trace down a rough subversion commit id window between when it
worked and didn't work?
I'd be happy to. It'll take me a couple weeks to do it. The fbsd boxes I
have are semi-production (my workstation at work and
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.orgwrote:
I did receive Shawn's report some time ago, I even installed Chromium to
try to reproduce it, but it didn't crash for me yet.
If there are some easy, but reliable steps to reproduce it, like open
this webpage in tab
Hey All,
Unless I'm misunderstanding how to do what I'm trying to do, I'm unable to
destroy a zfs dataset that was cloned and subsequently promoted from
another dataset. Am I doing something wrong?
Log of what I'm doing:
[shawn@shawn-vm-host ~]$ sudo zfs send
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
Unless I'm misunderstanding how to do what I'm trying to do, I'm unable to
destroy a zfs dataset that was cloned and subsequently promoted from
another dataset. Am I doing something wrong?
Log of what I'm doing
Hey All,
I just got a kernel panic on a recent build of 10-current on my amd64 box.
The core.txt file has been pasted here: http://ix.io/4T7
If you need any other info, let me know.
Thanks,
Shawn
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
where to go from here. If
there's any other info you need, please let me know. I'm a newb at
submitting this kind of stuff.
Paste of info file: http://ix.io/4Qo
Paste of core.txt file: http://ix.io/4Qp
Thanks,
Shawn Webb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:34:46AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
...
This gives me an idea. The only so to say 'vm' change in r248508 was an
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 06:34:46AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote
I've been having random panics since the VM changes. I'm stuck
running r247527. If I try to install a newer kernel/world, I get random
panics (I really should enable crashdumps). Not a big deal, but I'm mostly
interested in epair fixes and bhyve enhancements.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:00 PM,
I'm on r247095. My box is failing to boot on a Dell Precision T7500. I'm
running ZFS as root with a mirrored root pool.
Here's a pic of the box failing:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Lq_jlX8of0o/USY4cqZ5BOI/GoI/Nd1LGPbFjHc/s1112/IMG_20130221_100723.jpg
There isn't much useful
I'm building now. I should know whether or not it works. I'm assuming the
updated gas is in base? My userland is r247095, but my kernel is r246990.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Steve Kargl
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:14:07PM +0100, O. Hartmann
The results are in: success! Thanks everyone. This is why I love FreeBSD:
the community is amazing!
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:54 PM, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.dewrote:
Am 02/21/13 22:01, schrieb Shawn Webb:
I'm building now. I should know whether or not it works. I'm assuming
This is awesome. Lack of Android tools support almost keeps me from fully
switching from OSX to FreeBSD. Any chance adb is or will be supported?
Thanks,
Shawn
On Mar 26, 2011 9:10 AM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 26 March 2011 15:30:01 Carlos A. M. dos Santos
. To work around that, I'm giving owner@ full permissions (the full_set
ACL set).
I'll also include my ZFS ACL Sets patch. That has already been submitted
upstream and I'm awaiting approval.
Thanks,
Shawn
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just finished
I'm so excited for your work. Thanks so much for bringing zpool v28 to
FreeBSD. Will v28 come to 8-stable?
Thanks,
Shawn
On Feb 27, 2011 1:56 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi.
I just committed ZFSv28 to HEAD.
New major features:
- Data deduplication.
- Triple parity
for upgrade to FreeBSD 9?
It seems that if a system has that kind of uptime, it's a high priority
server and uptime needs to be maintained.
Maybe it would be possible to have both sysinstall and bsdinstall on the
same install medium?
Thanks,
Shawn Webb
?
Thanks,
Shawn Webb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Disregard. I didn't have ksh93 installed. The handbook implies that it's
needed only for DTrace Toolkit, not DTrace itself. Installing ksh93 is
required for DTrace proper to work.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey fellow current users,
Looks like dtrace
Attached is a new patch using the acl(3) API for removing invalid
inheritance. Unless there are other suggestions, I'll likely submit this
upstream. I didn't implement the -P flag since that's the default behavior.
Thanks,
Shawn
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote
at 7:51 PM, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
I've just finished a patch to add recursive functionality to setfacl.
Before
I officially submit it, I'd like a few suggestions
I've just finished a patch to add recursive functionality to setfacl. Before
I officially submit it, I'd like a few suggestions on how to improve the
patch.
The part I'm worried about involves the #define directive at top. I'm not
sure what ramifications using that define might have. I needed it
Attached is the patch. I'm also storing my FreeBSD patches at
https://github.com/lattera/patches
Thanks,
Shawn
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
Shawn Webb wrote:
I've just finished a patch to add recursive functionality to setfacl.
Before
I
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
I've just finished a patch to add recursive functionality to setfacl.
Before
I officially submit it, I'd like a few suggestions on how to improve the
patch.
The part I'm
I'm having trouble building freebsd-current (sources as of 29 Jan 2011) with
the latest zpool v28 patch. `make buildworld` fails. I'd attach a copy of
the build log, but it's pretty big. I can put it online on my tech blog if
needed. Has anyone else had the same problem? The `uname -a` output of
at 104205.
7 out of 9 hunks failed--saving rejects to zfs_20101212.patch.rej
done
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having trouble building freebsd-current (sources as of 29 Jan 2011)
with
the latest zpool v28 patch. `make
201 - 235 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
