Re: setpgrp(1, 1) does not FAIL

2002-02-27 Thread Takanori Saneto
Can you look into PR kern/29844 as well? I think after your fix, it should fail even when invoked by super user. Regards, In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:44:23 +0900, HIROSHI OOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: oota The following

Re: /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current

2002-02-11 Thread Takanori Saneto
Re: Re: /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a hack^Wpatch that should fix your problem. I think you need to prevent returning the value of uninitialized variable (``error'') when

Re: /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current

2002-02-09 Thread Takanori Saneto
Re: "Re: /dev/rtc not configured message when starting VMWare2 on -current" In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Munehiro Matsuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a hack^Wpatch that should fix your problem. I think you need to prevent returning the value of uninitialized variable (``error'') when

Re: VMWare2 permission problems on -current as of Sep 26 [FIXED]

2001-10-13 Thread Takanori Saneto
Hi, all, Due to mail trouble, I couldn't join this thread, but I submitted PR via web on this problem fix (kern/31122). Your patch seems better than what I attached to the PR (I didn't care about gid's in my patch). My PR should be closed when the patch is commited. In article [EMAIL

issue on STRIP make variable

2001-08-21 Thread Takanori Saneto
(I once tried to send this message which did not seem to reach to the list, so I'm trying again. If you see this message twice, sorry for it) In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takanori Saneto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, folks, I think there is problem about the treatment of STRIP make

Re: sys/modules/procfs/Makefile buglet

1999-05-06 Thread Takanori Saneto
Besides procfs_rlimit(), there are several undefined symbols in procfs.ko: % nm /modules/procfs.ko | egrep ' U procfs_' U procfs_read_fpregs U procfs_read_regs U procfs_sstep U procfs_write_fpregs U procfs_write_regs Is this OK? -- さねを