After r253088, systems with IPSEC and KSTACK_PAGES 4 crashes on
booting into multi-user mode.
The crash is due to sysctl -a in /etc/rc.d/initrandom ended up with
kernel stack overflow.
The problem is what we have in sys/net/vnet.h:
#define SYSCTL_VNET_PCPUSTAT(parent, nbr, name, type, array,
Hi all,
A good news to owners of i830, i845, i852, i855 and i865 (a.k.a. gen2),
who've got frustrated with the bad performance with KMS.
I managed to track down the root cause of the slowness of gen2 with KMS and
finally fixed it.
The attached one-liner patch is the fix.
(It was my surprise that
Has anyone noticed this with head since r242184?
% sudo service apache22 start
Performing sanity check on apache22 configuration:
Syntax OK
Starting apache22.
setfib: NO: invalid FIB (max 0)
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache22: WARNING: failed to start apache22
I injected the following lines into
I think it should be forwarded to -multimedia@.
Other than that, it's nice to hear about!
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:13:56 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
A few days ago, I stumbled into sthis at Phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTE1NzY
The above
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 00:14:14 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:08:30 +0200
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012-07-04 16:33, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
For people having
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:11:31 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 04:15:18AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 00:14:14 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote
For people having SIGBUS with clang-build world + gcc-build binaries,
In short words, for any libraries (and never forget about rtld-elf!)
which are potentially called from arbitrary binaries,
compile them with either -mstackrealign or -mstack-alignment=8!
The detail is as follows.
I've
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:08:30 +0200
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012-07-04 16:33, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
For people having SIGBUS with clang-build world + gcc-build binaries,
In short words, for any libraries (and never forget about rtld-elf!)
which are potentially called
When I built the world as of r237813, clang reported a warning which
caught my attention.
=== sys/boot/zfs (all)
clang -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -DBOOTPROG=\zfsloader\
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../.. -I.
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../../lib/libstand
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:22:19 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
(snip)
I would be more than glad to open up an office to certify USB devices for use
with FreeBSD :-)
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way
to check whether the one is
I'm glad to report that your patch fixes not only wlock-within-wlock cases
but also rlock-within-wlock cases properly!
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:42:39 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 04:04:11AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
(snip)
The following
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:53:38 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:34:01PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:53AM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
FreeBSD FBSD10
The following is the first occurence of wlock-within-wlock incident
when I run xfdesktop-settings under gdb.
Hardware watchpoint 3: lock_place[0].count_ww
Old value = 0
New value = 1
0x28f52522 in _thr_rtld_wlock_acquire (lock=0x28f63600)
at /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_rtld.c:152
152
Thanks a lot to investigate this problem so deeply.
I have, maybe related, a bit strange phenomenon among xdm, too.
I have a bit different setup than others: I'm using modified
x11/gdm/files/gdm.in to launch xdm.
The problem is, when I start xdm manually from ttyvX like this:
exec sudo service
Suppose some bit error of memory or storage of the tinderbox machine?
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:41:28 GMT
FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
(snip)
/src/sys/dev/arcmsr/arcmsr.h:43:2: error: invalid preprocessing directive
#denine
'f'(0x66) ^ 'n'(0x6e) = 0x08
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:06:21 +0100
Gavin Atkinson gavin.atkin...@ury.york.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 19:53 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hans,
Why haven't those patches been committed?
This patch is an absolute hack, and shouldn't be committed as it is.
I would, however,
This patch works.
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Tue Apr 19 10:52:58 MSD 2011
# sysctl hw.acpi.thermal
hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0
hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10
hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 67.5C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:30:16 +0100
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
PR filed as kern/146614.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=146614
--
-|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku
| __ t...@tackymt.homeip.net
- A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs. -
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Greetings,
I found a bug in if_em.c which triggers a panic when resuming from the 2nd
suspend. (sleep, wakeup, sleep and wakeup will result to a panic)
It seems it has got introduced by r206001 (head) or r206211 (stable/8).
I guess the following change mistakenly slipped into em_resume() which
because the bug makes
hostcache useless with TCPv6 and/or brings TTCP (RFC1644) meaningless.
Especially the bug renders it unusable to use TCPv6 and TTCP together.
# To confirm this: sysctl net.inet.tcp.rfc1644=1; telnet ::1
Best regards,
Taku
--
-|-__YAMAMOTO, Taku [EMAIL PROTECTED
= (CPU_MAX_SPEED - 1) cpu_duty_offset;
p_cnt = ~clk_val;
p_cnt |= (speed cpu_duty_offset);
Virtually yours,
Taku
--
YAMAMOTO, Taku [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital circuits are made from analog parts.
-- Don Vonada
To Unsubscribe: send mail
At Tue, 15 Jan 2002 03:08:53 -0800 (PST),
Shizuka Kudo wrote:
Dear all,
Does anyone have tested whether this card works with
current 5.0 NEWCARD? I tried it on a Thinkpad 600X
with current 5.0 cvsupped yestersday and received a
kernel: found-vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8138,
23 matches
Mail list logo
