Re: May 2024 stabilization week

2024-05-28 Thread void
Hi Gleb, On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:24:14PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Replying to this email thread with your success reports as well as reporting any regressions is very much appreciated. Thanks! Works fine, no issues on arm64.aarch64 where it's running nginx, monit and a poudriere

Re: pkg server for current/arm64 stopped ? [main-armv7 on ampere2, elapsed so far: 651:21:56]

2024-04-18 Thread void
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:02:30AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: void wrote on Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:08:36 UTC : Not sure where to post this.. The last bulk build for arm64 appears to have happened around mid-March on ampere2. Is it broken? main-armv7 building is broken and the last

new tls-cert-store and cert-bundle methods

2024-02-16 Thread void
Hello, Now that we have system tls-cert-store, if one needs to reference a tls-cert-bundle like provided by ca_root_nss, do we need to concatenate all of the certs listed in /usr/share/certs/trusted into, for example cert.pem then symlink /etc/ssl/cert.pem to that concatenated file? thanks in

Re: make buildworld failure on arm64 on -current n267777

2024-01-28 Thread void
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024, at 00:14, void wrote: > In /usr/src # git rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD > 26 in /usr/src, a 'git reset --hard' followed by 'git pull' and then 'git checkout main' fixed this. For some reason, 'git pull --ff-only' didn't pull /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/

Re: meta mode

2024-01-27 Thread void
On Sat, 27 Jan 2024, at 13:59, Warner Losh wrote: > Approximately never. The only time I've had issues were when the > machine crashed due to sudden power failure during the build which lead > to the last few .o files to be zero length with UFS. > > Non clean normal builds have lots of issues

Re: meta mode

2024-01-27 Thread void
Hi, On Sat, 27 Jan 2024, at 13:51, Lexi Winter wrote: > the (easiest) fix for that is to do a full rebuild every time > __FreeBSD_version changes. > > pkg(8) bug report: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/2162 > > i don't know if meta mode will catch this and rebuild correctly, but > since

meta mode

2024-01-27 Thread void
Hi, I use meta-mode in /etc/src-env.conf so that if (for example) a small change in the kernel config is made, the machine doesn't take hours recompiling. Also, (I *think* it works this way) if src gets updated by git and world/kernel rebuilt it won't recompile already compiled files provided I

make buildworld failure on arm64 on -current n267777

2024-01-25 Thread void
In /usr/src # git rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD 26 include/machine -> /usr/src/sys/arm64/include Building /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/stand/efi/loader_4th/vers.c Building /usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/stand/efi/loader_4th/8x16.c Building

Re: loading vmm.ko crashes main-n267684-e4b646ce1610

2024-01-25 Thread void
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 03:34:54PM +0800, Zhenlei Huang wrote: You may want to configure the dump device before get the coredump. See https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug/#kerneldebug-obtain

loading vmm.ko crashes main-n267684-e4b646ce1610

2024-01-23 Thread void
Hello, Loading vmm either via vmm_load=YES in /boot/loader.conf or manually via kldload vmm crashes the system to db> prompt as shown in the link below: http://void.f-m.fm.user.fm/Screenshot_20240122_135539.png Thing is, access is via a html5 console with no up/down scrolling or buffer. Nothing

Re: vmm_load crashes to debugger early

2024-01-22 Thread void
Hi, On Mon, 22 Jan 2024, at 12:48, Ronald Klop wrote: > Hi, > > Can you mount /boot on another system? not sure how as the system cannot find the pool called 'zroot'. There are two zpools on the server - zroot for HD and 'ssd' for the ssds. I can boot to -current usb stick and zpool import -f

vmm_load crashes to debugger early

2024-01-22 Thread void
Hello, On a very recent -current, vmm_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf crashes the system to debugger early on in the boot sequence. I can't even reach single user mode How can I prevent this one element of /boot/loader.conf from loading? thanks in advance for any advice --

Re: bsdinstall use on rpi4

2024-01-13 Thread void
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 08:24:13AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 03:26:19PM +, void wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use bsdinstall on FreeBSD-15.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch64-RPI-20240111-a61d2c7fbd3c-267507.img to install to usb3-connected HD, using the 'expert mode' for UFS

bsdinstall use on rpi4

2024-01-13 Thread void
Hi, I'm trying to use bsdinstall on FreeBSD-15.0-CURRENT-arm64-aarch64-RPI-20240111-a61d2c7fbd3c-267507.img to install to usb3-connected HD, using the 'expert mode' for UFS, after having initially booted from mmcsd. The goal is to boot to usb3 with freebsd on UFS filesystem, and to have that

Re: poudriere: swap_pager: out of swap space

2024-01-11 Thread void
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 02:21:19AM +, Lexi Winter wrote: hi list, i'm having a recurring problem with poudriere that i hope someone might have an idea about. i'm building packages with poudriere on a system with 32GB memory, with tmpfs and md disabled in poudriere (so it's using ZFS only)

Re: route ipv6 errors on bootup in -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on arm64

2024-01-09 Thread void
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:24:40PM +, void wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:24:53AM +, void wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote: Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general bug which should be filed (which can be easily checked

Re: route ipv6 errors on bootup in -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on arm64

2024-01-09 Thread void
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:24:53AM +, void wrote: On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote: Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general bug which should be filed (which can be easily checked/avoided using the FEATURES(9) subsystem)… Cheers! -Enji

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-09 Thread void
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Olivier Certner wrote:i So, to me, at this point, it still sounds more than a gimmick than something really useful. If someone has a precise use case for it and motivation, than of course please go ahead. The only use-cases I [1] can think of are

Re: noatime on ufs2

2024-01-09 Thread void
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 12:41:02PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote: Hi, Does /var/mail still need atime? I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime, will it have

Re: route ipv6 errors on bootup in -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on arm64

2024-01-09 Thread void
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote: Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general bug which should be filed (which can be easily checked/avoided using the FEATURES(9) subsystem)… Cheers! -Enji world/kernel was built with WITHOUT_INET6= in

route ipv6 errors on bootup in -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on arm64

2024-01-07 Thread void
Hi, on a rpi4/8GB, my rc.conf looks like so. It's an ipv4-only system on a LAN not directly connected to the internet hostname="generic.home.arpa" ifconfig_genet0="inet 192.168.1.199 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" sshd_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NONE"

noatime on ufs2

2024-01-07 Thread void
Hi, Does /var/mail still need atime? I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime, will it have consequences for /var/mail ? --

Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK

2023-11-17 Thread void
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 10:13:05AM +0100, tue...@freebsd.org wrote: You can load the kernel module using kldload tcp_rack You can make the RACK stack the default stack using sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack Hi, thank you for this.

odd bhyve guest message (Khelp module "ertt" can't unload)

2023-10-18 Thread void
I'm seeing this message on exit from a 14.0-RC1 guest on a host running main-n265915 when it exits normally (via poweroff within the guest): pflog0: promiscuous mode disabled Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop... done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer'

Re: nvme timeout issues with hardware and bhyve vm's

2023-10-15 Thread void
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, at 15:53, Warner Losh wrote: > The one with the uboot traceback? I can't help you there. The report is > confusing. I don't know the error / problem being reported to even know > what to look at. Or is it a different thing? I'm so confused at this > point. I also think we

Re: nvme timeout issues with hardware and bhyve vm's

2023-10-15 Thread void
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023, at 15:35, Warner Losh wrote: > I've fixed all known nvme issues in current that aren't caused by other > parts of the system. If it isn't a very recent 15 or 14, then there > are known issues and you'll need to try those first. The problem manifested with a source upgrade

Re: nvme timeout issues with hardware and bhyve vm's

2023-10-15 Thread void
Hi, On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, at 03:40, Pete Wright wrote: > I had similar issues on my workstation as well. Scrubbing the NVMe > device on my real-hardware workstation hasn't turned up any issues, but > the system has locked up a handful of times. > > Just curious if others have seen the same, or

Re: how to set vfs.zfs.arc.max in 15-current ?

2023-10-13 Thread void
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 09:46:08AM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: That is a bit odd, arc min used to be 64MB as lowest value - that is, it should never be 0. It was the default here (i.e. the value wasn't set in either loader.conf or sysctl.conf) world+kernel was built/installed today the 13th

Re: how to set vfs.zfs.arc.max in 15-current ?

2023-10-13 Thread void
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 08:12:47AM +0200, Juraj Lutter wrote: Set also vfs.zfs.arc.min to some value higher than zero. aha! that worked!!! :D root@beer:/root# sysctl vfs.zfs.arc.min=1073741824 vfs.zfs.arc.min: 0 -> 1073741824 root@beer:/root# sysctl vfs.zfs.arc.max=8589934592

Re: how to set vfs.zfs.arc.max in 15-current ?

2023-10-12 Thread void
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: In message , void writes: Is there a new way to set arc.max in 15-current? It's no longer settable (except to "0") in main-n265801 (Oct 7th) while multiuser. # sysctl vfs.zfs.arc.max=8589934592 vfs.zfs.arc.max

how to set vfs.zfs.arc.max in 15-current ?

2023-10-12 Thread void
Is there a new way to set arc.max in 15-current? It's no longer settable (except to "0") in main-n265801 (Oct 7th) while multiuser. # sysctl vfs.zfs.arc.max=8589934592 vfs.zfs.arc.max: 0 sysctl: vfs.zfs.arc.max=8589934592: Invalid argument --

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 06:05:14PM +0100, void wrote: On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 05:22:20PM +0100, Warner Losh wrote: So, either you have to turn off those features (which I got no clue how to do in the normal installer), or you have to update userboot.so to the FreeBSD 14 version (which I think

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 06:35:01PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: As this is the continuation of a thread I started in June, let me top post again the solution I used back then: Hi, I saw your fix but vm-bhyve is unavailable for me to use for a variety of reasons. --

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 05:22:20PM +0100, Warner Losh wrote: So, either you have to turn off those features (which I got no clue how to do in the normal installer), or you have to update userboot.so to the FreeBSD 14 version (which I think had a good chance of actually running on FreeBSD 13

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 08:43:49AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: void wrote on Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 12:12:02 UTC : On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 12:55:19PM +0100, Warner Losh wrote: >Yes. The boot loader comes from the host. It must know how to read ZFS. It knows how to read zfs. I expect War

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 12:55:19PM +0100, Warner Losh wrote: Yes. The boot loader comes from the host. How does this work for non-zfs aware hosts? --

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 12:55:19PM +0100, Warner Losh wrote: Yes. The boot loader comes from the host. It must know how to read ZFS. It knows how to read zfs. On the host in question, there are many guests, some with zfs-boot, some not, just file-based. What the host is not, is zfs-on-root.

Re: CURRRENT snapshot won't boot due missing ZFS feature

2023-09-16 Thread void
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:11:15PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: Hi, I didn't dig into this yet. After installing the current 14-snapshot (June 1st) in a bhyve-vm, I get this on boot: ZFS: unsupported feature: com.klarasystems:vdev_zaps_v2 (booting stops at this point) Seems like the boot

ifconfig: missing or corrupted regdomain database

2023-08-10 Thread void
Hello current@, I'm trying to set up atheros wireless on a desktop. The error in response to "ifconfig wlan0 up" is the expected info sans IP address with the added message of "ifconfig: missing or corrupted regdomain database" How can I fix this? System is amd64 built around 1020 UTC today

Re: qt6 the default qt on -current?

2023-08-09 Thread void
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 04:47:36PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: Please, use ports@ list next time. Every supported FreeBSD version uses the same ports/ tree. Not supported FreeBSD versions require a time machine i.e., rolling back the ports/ tree to a date before EOL. OK. I didn't think the query

qt6 the default qt on -current?

2023-08-09 Thread void
Hello list, How can I build making qt6 the default Qt? I'm using poudriere to build. I can see that for some ports there's a 'uses: qt6' that goes in the port. What I was looking for was a default string I can use with a poudriere make.conf like there is for python or perl. ty --

Re: poudriere && git

2023-08-07 Thread void
On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 04:11:00PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: I'm now already running a new "make buildworld" again, which perhaps will but the actual tools into .../legacy/... and they will work because tools and shared libs fit together. I think there is something broken in buildworld with

Re: cc_vegas isn't built in recent current

2023-07-12 Thread void
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 01:42:03PM +0100, void wrote: (cc_vegas) I notice that on -current the default is cc_cubic so will roll with that for now. Unless there's an algo that better suits FTTP which has spiky latency. --

cc_vegas isn't built in recent current

2023-07-12 Thread void
Maybe the question I need to ask before asking about this is "what is the best tcp algo to use in the situation where: 1. gigabit fibre on consumer FTTP 2. on a freebsd host whose purpose is hosting bhyve guests" I expected to load cc_vegas as, from what I've read, it's the best (most

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

2023-07-12 Thread void
thanks everyone it's working normally now after full buildworld kernel then forced rebuild of all ports from their updated sources --

Re: problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

2023-07-09 Thread void
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 05:17:38PM +0100, void wrote: Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now

problems on new -current install with pkg/ssl

2023-07-09 Thread void
Hi, On a fresh 14-current install (main-n263444-653738e895ba) I try to use pkg for anything and this error happens: # pkg install doas The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: y Bootstrapping pkg from

Re: OpenZFS recently (was aarch64: lang/gcc1* build regression between Mar-28 and Apr-8 [zfs corruptions without block_cloning involved!])

2023-04-15 Thread void
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 09:56:34AM +0100, Graham Perrin wrote: Is the recent situation unusual enough to warrant an entry in UPDATING? yeah I'd say so. Also does this affect 13-stable and the recent 13.2-RELEASE or just -current? --

Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : ld: error: args.o: Opaque pointers are only supported in -opaque-pointers mode (Producer: 'LLVM15.0.7' Reader: 'LLVM 14.0.5')

2023-03-31 Thread void
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:30:15PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: Warner Losh wrote on Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 22:15:38 UTC : On Thu, Mar 30, 2023, 3:45 PM void wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:56:53PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > >To my knowledge, FreeBSD has not actively sup

Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : ld: error: args.o: Opaque pointers are only supported in -opaque-pointers mode (Producer: 'LLVM15.0.7' Reader: 'LLVM 14.0.5')

2023-03-30 Thread void
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 12:56:53PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: To my knowledge, FreeBSD has not actively supported newer FreeBSD building older FreeBSD across versions. Are you sure? I routinely build & run 12.4 and 12-stable bhyve and poudriere jail instances on -current. --

Re: ns8250: UART FCR is broken

2022-10-27 Thread void
flushed, but I'm glad my warning was able to flag a bug. :-) If "void" is comfortable with kernel hacking, it would be great to confirm that the warning is indeed coming from the transmit side not being flushed; a printf("drain = %d\n", drain); would be sufficient. And yes, only e

ns8250: UART FCR is broken

2022-10-24 Thread void
hello freebsd-current@, this started appearing in dmesg ns8250: UART FCR is broken ns8250: UART FCR is broken uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 ns8250: UART FCR is broken uart0: console (9600,n,8,1) ns8250: UART FCR is broken ns8250: UART FCR is broken

pkg won't bootstrap on -current

2022-10-17 Thread void
It seems pkg won't bootstrap on -current, at least not for me on arm64.aarch64 I've not tried yet with just a snapshot. version is main-n258626-865f46b25559 built today 17th Oct 22. The error is # pkg bootstrap The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to

Re: TP-LINK USB no carrier after speed test

2022-09-15 Thread void
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 01:45:11PM -0300, Ivan Quitschal wrote: capabilities=68009b ether 54:af:97:86:be:2c inet 192.168.0.35 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet 1000baseT status: active supported media: media

Re: -current hangs during boot (UPDATING entry)

2000-10-24 Thread void
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 06:30:29PM -0400, John W. De Boskey wrote: 5. At this time, remove ALL MFS filesystems from /etc/fstab. They can be hand mounted after bootup or via a local rc startup script. You can leave them in, with option "noauto", and mount them later with "mount -a -t

Re: randomdev entropy gathering is really weak

2000-07-26 Thread void
How does OpenBSD handle this issue? Anyone know? -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Workaround for hanging on exit: patch for review

2000-04-27 Thread void
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:06:16AM -0500, Michael C . Wu wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:14:02AM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov scribbled: | I often notice processes hanging forever on exit's ttywait when TCP | connection dropped. Here is a patch I plan to commit which restrict | waiting for