In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes:
: I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
: service than actual service.
Actually, which ports, specically, doesn't this work with? I've
installed several ports with PREFIX defined to something odd and have
had minimal
Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mike Meyer writes:
: I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
: service than actual service.
Actually, which ports, specically, doesn't this work with? I've
installed several ports with PREFIX defined
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 09:40:31PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
I always thought ``make PREFIX=/tmp/foo package'' is pretty obvious.. but
...
What does the above command do if the port isn't PREFIX clean?
Installs the ports's bits into [most likely] /usr/local, cause an error
while trying to
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 08:21:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. It would be nice if FreeBSD could use the same system as NetBSD,
storing the packages/ports under /usr/pkg.
That's why PREFIX exists.
I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
service than actual service.
I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me
know and it _will_ be fixed. If you know others, please open a PR,
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:59:51PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
I know. Unfortunately, support for PREFIX seems to draw more lip
service than actual service.
I disagree. If one of the ports I maintain isn't PREFIX-clean, let me
know and it _will_ be
