5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Ames
I usually stick to just running -RELEASE but since I had some time I thought I'd try 5.0-DP2 and now have a few questions. 1. I did an ftp install. My machine has two RealTek 8029 cards in it but only one of them has a cable attached. When sysinstall asked me which interface to use it gave me

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote: 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has been running for almost 24 hours and it's not finished yet. Is this to be expected? Yes. gcc 3.x is slower, and

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 29 November 2002 12:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote: 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has been running for almost 24 hours and it's not finished

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Robert Ames
Kris Kennaway wrote: 3. When trying to rcp files to this machine I get a rshd: Login incorrect error. I have inetd configured and running and a .rhosts file in place (with proper permissions). I'm assuming this might be PAM related. Any suggestions? Can you log in with plain rsh? Do the

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Wolfskill
From: David Syphers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:47 -0600 [Well, I'm Cc:ing -current anyway -- dhw] Out of curiosity, how much slower is a 5.x kernel compilation than a 4.x, on average? My 486, 66 MHz and 16 MB RAM, compiles a 4.x kernel in about 3

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Syphers
On Friday 29 November 2002 01:32 pm, David Wolfskill wrote: ... That should, at least, provide a reasonably valid set of comparisons. Thanks. I suppose Robert's results might be abnormally long if -current requires a lot more memory than -stable, thus requiring a lot of swap, as Kris pointed

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:02:42PM -0600, David Syphers wrote: On Friday 29 November 2002 01:32 pm, David Wolfskill wrote: ... That should, at least, provide a reasonably valid set of comparisons. Thanks. I suppose Robert's results might be abnormally long if -current requires a lot

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:28:35PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: 3. When trying to rcp files to this machine I get a rshd: Login incorrect error. I have inetd configured and running and a .rhosts file in place (with proper permissions). I'm assuming this might be PAM

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:20:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's often more efficient to use binary installations/upgrades than source, on slow machines. For example, I build world on a fast machine, mount via NFS and then installworld on my slower machines. Quite so -- not only

Re: 5.0-DP2 questions

2002-11-29 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David Syphers wrote: On Friday 29 November 2002 12:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote: 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has been