Re: nfe0 connection not as reliable; a few questions...

2016-04-24 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 19:48:46 -0700 (PDT), "Jeffrey Bouquet" wrote: > Updated current { from Sept last year } to this week... and nfe0 now seems > to require a reboot > daily at least { no access to beyond-the-lan ... } > > Is there maybe some tunable (net.inet... ) related or sysctl { ke

nfe0 connection not as reliable; a few questions...

2016-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
Updated current { from Sept last year } to this week... and nfe0 now seems to require a reboot daily at least { no access to beyond-the-lan ... } Is there maybe some tunable (net.inet... ) related or sysctl { kern.ipc... } similar, that could be a cause? New code of ifconfig or the network

Re: A few questions

2002-11-03 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-11-02 00:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 01-Nov-2002 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging >>> code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included d

Re: A few questions

2002-11-02 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off : > very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. : > [

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [...] >> And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging >> code (including INVARIANTS stuff) is included during a buildworld? > > INVARIANTS and WITNESS are kernel

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:39:00PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off >> very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. >> >> It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 01-Nov-2002 Conrad Sabatier wrote: > I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off > very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. > > It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, > suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start du

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:39:00PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off > very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. > > It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, > suddenly X (or perhaps ju

Re: A few questions

2002-11-01 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-31 18:39, Conrad Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off > very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. > [...] > And finally, is there a simple way to ensure that none of the debugging > code (including I

A few questions

2002-10-31 Thread Conrad Sabatier
I just upgraded a 4.7-STABLE box to current over the weekend. Went off very well, thanks to the great documentation in UPDATING. It's odd, though, that after upgrading again just a few days later, suddenly X (or perhaps just xdm) failed to start due to an unresolved symbol. I had already upgrade