Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-13 Thread Doug White
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable way to run your system. How common is the need for this? Does turning of mixed mode when it's not needed give

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Nov-2003 Doug White wrote: On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote: Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable way to run your system. How common is the need for this? Does turning of

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-12 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
I, for one, am always pleased to see these sort of in-depth explanations of these sort of shims. On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:35:26AM -0500 I heard the voice of John Baldwin, and lo! it spake thus: It's documented in /sys/i386/conf/NOTES now along with 'device apic'. For a longer explanation

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable way to run your system. How common is the need for this? Does turning of mixed mode when it's not needed give any real advantages higher up? NO_MIXED_MODE disables a hack which

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Monday 10 November 2003 19:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, I have one reproducable panic with

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-10 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Monday 10 November 2003 19:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 08-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling device

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-07 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling device apic in the kernel. While building OpenOffice about 1 1/2 hours after start the system reboots. This is

APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-06 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello, I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling device apic in the kernel. While building OpenOffice about 1 1/2 hours after start the system reboots. This is absolutely reproducable. Removing device apic from the kernel solves the problem! The only thing I have

RE: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-06 Thread John Baldwin
On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello, I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling device apic in the kernel. While building OpenOffice about 1 1/2 hours after start the system reboots. This is absolutely reproducable. Removing device apic from the

Re: APIC-UP related panic

2003-11-06 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote: On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: *SCHNIP* Nov 5 13:41:40 cale kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 Nov 5 13:41:40 cale kernel: current process= 26 (irq16: nvidia0) Nov 5 13:41:40 cale kernel: