On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Don't use the '-r' option, it gets confused because geom::BSD does
not lie to it.
Yes, that seems to work...
Time to say good bye for '-r' ?
Bye!
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Reifenberger
writes:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Don't use the '-r' option, it gets confused because geom::BSD does
not lie to it.
Yes, that seems to work...
Time to say good bye for '-r' ?
Well, we still need it for writing the first
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 10:17:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Reifenberger
writes:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Don't use the '-r' option, it gets confused because geom::BSD does
not lie to it.
Yes, that seems to work...
Time
Hi,
trying to disklabel new disks I get:
(nihil)(root) # disklabel -w -B da0s1 auto
(nihil)(root) # disklabel -r da0s1
# /dev/da0s1c:
type: unknown
disk: amnesiac
label:
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 24792
sectors/unit:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Reifenberger w
rites:
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
--0-240786022-1043432225=:647
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets. if the flag is not set then absolute offsets are
expected.. That would give a way for us to move forward while still
allowing partitions to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets. if the flag is not set then absolute offsets are
expected.. That would give a way for
I agree with that too.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ju
lian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets. if the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets...
Better plan: Abandon BSD labels before disks outgrow them.
To be replaced
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, walt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets...
Better plan: Abandon BSD labels before
Julian Elischer wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, walt wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets...
Better
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], walt writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
I think that one of the things we need to do is declare a new flag in
disklabel that declares that the disklabel has been converted to use
relative offsets...
Better plan: Abandon BSD labels before
12 matches
Mail list logo
