On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
I've been using extended slices on both
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
I've been using extended
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:03:53AM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect
of:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel. This
is sorta bad, but I can bare for now.
Also, I tried searching the sys/geom/ tree if there was anything
relating to this, but could not find
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hiten Pandya writes:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel. This
is sorta bad, but I can bare for now.
Also, I tried searching the sys/geom/ tree if there was
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
I've been using extended slices on both -stable and -current for
quite a while without any problems, both with and without
