Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-25 Thread Emiel Kollof
Magnus B{ckstr|m heeft op zondag 24 februari 2002 om 22:30 het volgende geschreven: > + mtx_lock(&Giant); > + Wasn't this _not_ the way to lock GIant, according to Matt Dillon? Look for previous posts where he explains. Cheers, Emiel Kollof To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-24 Thread Magnus B{ckstr|m
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Michael Smith wrote: > Try grabbing Giant in acpi_tz_thread when it wakes up, then dropping it > again before it goes to sleep. This is probably a hack, but I'd guess a > required one for now. > > If that works, send me a diff and I'll commit it with thanks! Yow! Works abso

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-24 Thread Michael Smith
> Wow! This did away with the once-a-minute error messages from Notify()s > on processor objects on my laptop. > > However, I am now getting frequent panics from from a GIANT_REQUIRED > assertion in kmem_malloc(). kmem_malloc() gets called via malloc() from > AcpiOsAllocate(), without Giant loc

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-24 Thread Magnus B{ckstr|m
kern/kern_intr.c which blows up during boot. Regards, Magnus On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Mike Smith wrote: > Subject: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated > > > I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop > (yes, I tagged it 0217, my bad). > > This is the first d

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-23 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 21:56:47 -0800 >From: Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop Yay...! >There aren't many changes in the FreeBSD-specific code, this is just >catching up with major improvements in the interpreter. >As usual, p

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop > (yes, I tagged it 0217, my bad). ...so just retag it. Add the correct tag on top of the incorrect one, then remove the incorrect tag. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-22 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020222 21:56] wrote: > > I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop > (yes, I tagged it 0217, my bad). Woo! Go Mike! -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-c

HEADS UP: ACPI CA updated

2002-02-22 Thread Mike Smith
I've finally updated the ACPI CA codebase with Intel's 20020214 drop (yes, I tagged it 0217, my bad). This is the first drop that Intel haven't asked me not to commit since the 20011120 version, so there are a large number of changes and bugfixes. See Intel's logs at http://developer.intel.com

Re: HEADS UP, ACPI CA updated.

2001-05-29 Thread nnd
As a result 'make buildkernel' is broken in 'sys/dev/acpica/Osd'. The next patch permits me to finish kernel building. N.Dudorov Index: sys/dev/acpica/Osd/OsdSchedule.c === RCS file: /scratch/CVS/src/sys/dev/acpica

Re: HEADS UP, ACPI CA updated.

2001-05-29 Thread Mike Smith
> > The ACPI core code in -current has been updated to the 20010518 drop from > Intel. You can read more about APCI CA at > >http://developer.intel.com/technology/ial/acpi Sorry, that should be http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi Regards, Mike -- ... every activity mee

HEADS UP, ACPI CA updated.

2001-05-29 Thread Mike Smith
The ACPI core code in -current has been updated to the 20010518 drop from Intel. You can read more about APCI CA at http://developer.intel.com/technology/ial/acpi This update doesn't add any new, visible functionality, but it should resolve a number of bugs and problems in the core interp