Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
I would be very annoyed if it were no longer possible to netboot
GENERIC...
I don't want to break that. :) I Just don't want to compile it in
unless I'm using NFS/ZFS, and on my 4MB flash boards I'm not booting
2012/1/5 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no:
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes:
Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required.
It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled.
Would it be possible to remove them from standard and make them
optional? Or
On 5 January 2012 05:48, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
[ A bit excessive on the cross-posting? arch@ alone was probably fine ]
I wanted to capture the attention of relevant people, as I don't want
to break some subtle setup that I'm not at all aware of.
NFS doesn't actually use them
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org writes:
Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required.
It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled.
Would it be possible to remove them from standard and make them
optional? Or is there a reason to keep it in base?
I
[ A bit excessive on the cross-posting? arch@ alone was probably fine ]
On Thursday, January 05, 2012 2:57:44 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to slim down the freebsd kernel to fit on some devices with
4MB of flash.
Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code
Hi,
I'm trying to slim down the freebsd kernel to fit on some devices with
4MB of flash.
Since I'm not using NFS or UFS_ACL, I wondered if that code required.
It turns out I can just build a kernel with those two disabled.
Would it be possible to remove them from standard and make them
