Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Aug-01 Paul Saab wrote: > Kenneth D. Merry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> diff2 output, on the other hand, won't run through patch properly. You >> have to run it through a fixup script to get it right. > > p4 diff -u -b branch p4 diff2 -u -b branch ^ -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PRO

Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-07 Thread Julian Elischer
Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I have pushed the thread pointers down through most of the code > > though there are still many many places that assume that there is only one > > thread per process. (no multithreading yet, but getting closer..) > > Keep u

Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-06 Thread Paul Saab
Kenneth D. Merry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > diff2 output, on the other hand, won't run through patch properly. You > have to run it through a fixup script to get it right. p4 diff -u -b branch That works just fine. -- Paul Saab Technical Yahoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL

Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-06 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 21:39:11 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote: > On 7 Aug 2001 05:07:13 +0200, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > At this stage diffs must be pushing close to 1MB (maybe more) > > > (I don't know as I don't know yet how to get p4 to generate diffs :-) > > > > Isn't it jus

Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-06 Thread Arun Sharma
On 7 Aug 2001 05:07:13 +0200, Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this stage diffs must be pushing close to 1MB (maybe more) > > (I don't know as I don't know yet how to get p4 to generate diffs :-) > > Isn't it just `p4 diff` ? The diff produced by the above command is not accepted

Re: KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-06 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > I have pushed the thread pointers down through most of the code > though there are still many many places that assume that there is only one > thread per process. (no multithreading yet, but getting closer..) Keep up the good progress :-) > At this st

KSE/threads progress report

2001-08-06 Thread Julian Elischer
I have pushed the thread pointers down through most of the code though there are still many many places that assume that there is only one thread per process. (no multithreading yet, but getting closer..) At this stage diffs must be pushing close to 1MB (maybe more) (I don't know as I don't know