Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
atrtc0: AT realtime clock port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
MS Do you have any solution?
In my case it was local patch for exotic embedded chipset...
--
// Black Lion AKA
W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
atrtc0: AT realtime clock port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
MS Do you have any solution?
In my case it was local patch for
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:24 +0200, Marek Salwerowicz wrote:
W dniu 2012-10-04 20:51, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Marek.
You wrote 3 октября 2012 г., 23:17:35:
atrtc0: AT realtime clock port 0x70-0x71 on acpi0
MS still the same in my environment, running FreeBSD 9.1 under ESXi5.1 host
W dniu 2012-09-19 22:22, Lev Serebryakov pisze:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
are in this
Hello, Freebsd-current.
I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
are in this unbootable VM too :)
Kernel is GENERIC.
VBox
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
LS build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
LS revision. Unfortunately, I cannot provide exact version, as sources
LS are in this
240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :)
Adrian
On 19 September 2012 13:37, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
LS build router's
Hello, Adrian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:41:20:
It looks like patch to RTC which is useful on Geode LX causes this
hang.
AC 240689 is a doc commit. Which commit is it really? :)
I'm testing theory (build kernel from fresh sources), that it is
caused by local RTC patch, which helps
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 00:37 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Freebsd-current.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:22:00:
LS I've upgraded my FreeBSD-CURRENT Virtual machine, which I use to
LS build router's NanoBSD image, to today's morning (MSK time, GMT+4)
LS revision. Unfortunately,
Ah, what's the patch?
adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
IL committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
IL learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what
IL the problem is (offhand,I
On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
IL committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
IL learn enough about
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:00 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 September 2012 13:54, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 20 сентября 2012 г., 0:46:24:
IL Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
IL committed because it locks up virtualbox.
On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k
times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that
condition.
Also, what's that RTCSA_8192 bit do?
That should set the interrupt rate
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:08 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:05, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
Add something to atrtc_start() to only loop over that loop say, 64k
times before dropping out; and print an error if it hits that
condition.
Also, what's
On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at
probe/attach, or during normal operation?
It's called just once, from the attach() routine for the rtc device.
Right. Just have it loop over say 100
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 14:30 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:12, Ian Lepore free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
Right. Being totally clueless, is atrc_start() called just at
probe/attach, or during normal operation?
It's called just once, from the attach() routine
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
...
Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what
On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
...
Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 15:10 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:57, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
...
Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
committed
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:57:30 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
...
Yes, exactly. I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
committed because it locks up virtualbox. I hope to find time soon to
learn enough
21 matches
Mail list logo
