On Wednesday, 14 November 2018 12:41:53 MST Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On 11/14/18 5:41 AM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > Ok I'll go ahead and commit that too.
>
> Applied to 12.0-BETA, Ryzen 7 2700 values are now in the 30-55C range.
> Looks reasonable.
Much better here, too:
On 11/14/18 5:41 AM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL?
> I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and
> sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same
> thing. I guess that patch never landed?
Perfect! Sounds like we are on the right track, at least.
Best,
Conrad
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:55 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:41:58 MST Conrad Meyer wrote:
> > You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL?
> > I.e., sometimes the CPU
On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:41:58 MST Conrad Meyer wrote:
> You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL?
> I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and
> sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same
> thing. I guess that
Please try r340426 :-).
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:41 PM Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL?
> I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and
> sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same
>
You know what, I wonder if you're running into the CUR_TEMP_RANGE_SEL?
I.e., sometimes the CPU chooses to report on a range from 0-225C and
sometimes -49C-206C. I think someone else's 2990WX did the same
thing. I guess that patch never landed? 102°C - 49°C is the very
reasonable 53°C.
Yeah,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> > Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat
> > plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your
> > cooling solution?
>
> D'oh, of
On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote:
> Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat
> plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your
> cooling solution?
D'oh, of course it's -54 instead of +54 (For some reason I presumed a
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:05 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 16:20:22 MST Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>
> > The 2700 has an offset of 0 though (2700X has 10).
> > And I'm seeing a difference of more than 30 degrees. I guess something
> > else must be happening here.
>
> I had
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 7:16 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >> I've attached it. If it gets filtered by the mail list, I'll
> >> make it http accessible.
> >
> > Thanks Daniel.
> >
> > It looks
On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 16:20:22 MST Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> The 2700 has an offset of 0 though (2700X has 10).
> And I'm seeing a difference of more than 30 degrees. I guess something
> else must be happening here.
I had thought 54 was the right offset for my 2990WX system, but now it's
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
I've attached it. If it gets filtered by the mail list, I'll
make it http accessible.
Thanks Daniel.
It looks like your hostbridge zero device has a different device id
than in my first
Of course, Johannes has already thought of this! See
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228480 and
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15567 .
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:41 PM Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > I've attached it. If it gets
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:26 PM Daniel Eischen wrote:
> I've attached it. If it gets filtered by the mail list, I'll
> make it http accessible.
Thanks Daniel.
It looks like your hostbridge zero device has a different device id
than in my first generation Ryzen system. Would you please try the
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Conrad Meyer wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01 AM Daniel Eischen wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
errors. Not sure if they are related.
Maybe
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:15 PM Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:41:47 -0500
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > >> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
> > >> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
> > >> errors. Not sure if they are
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:41:47 -0500
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
> >> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
> >> errors. Not sure if they are related.
> >
> > It s a bit legacy )
> > Try mine:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:01 AM Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
> errors. Not sure if they are related.
Maybe not. If they do not attach, it
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 2:06 PM, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:59:59 -0500 (EST)
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
>> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
>> errors. Not sure if they are related.
>
On 11/13/18 10:14 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>> After kldload amdtemp I see the following sysctls:
>> dev.cpu.0.temperature: 77.1C
>> dev.amdtemp.0.core0.sensor0: 77.1C
>>
>> The temperature I see in BIOS is much lower (maybe around 40.0C).
On 11/13/18 10:40 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/18 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Greg V wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 13:14:46 -0800
Conrad Meyer wrote:
> You can adjust dev.amdtemp.N.sensor_offset as needed. By default, the
> amdtemp sysctl gives you the unadjusted value. On different Ryzen
> models the raw value is wrong by different amounts. E.g. on my 1950X,
> I have sensor_offset set
> On Nov 13, 2018, at 4:02 PM, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/18 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Greg V wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen
>>> wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to track down a couple of things.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> After kldload amdtemp I see the following sysctls:
> dev.cpu.0.temperature: 77.1C
> dev.amdtemp.0.core0.sensor0: 77.1C
>
> The temperature I see in BIOS is much lower (maybe around 40.0C). Don't
> know if just the offset is wrong or the
On 11/13/18 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Greg V wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
>>> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Greg V wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
errors. Not sure if they are related.
These are the ACPI-related
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Daniel Eischen
wrote:
Greetings,
I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
errors. Not sure if they are related.
These are the ACPI-related warnings and errors during boot.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:59:59 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Eischen wrote:
> I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
> report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
> errors. Not sure if they are related.
It s a bit legacy )
Try mine:
Greetings,
I'm trying to track down a couple of things. amdtemp doesn't
report any temperature sensors, and acpi seems to have some
errors. Not sure if they are related.
These are the ACPI-related warnings and errors during boot.
Firmware Warning (ACPI): Optional FADT field
29 matches
Mail list logo
