From: Atte Peltomaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
If it's long enough to pause the console noticibly, the
next thing
to try is breaking to the debugger -- which might require an NMI
card -- to see what code it's stuck in during the pause.
It's noticeable - if you type under
Dan Nelson schrieb:
In the last episode (Jan 23), Rahul Siddharthan said:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave
things like this in:
options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
If it's long enough to pause the console noticibly, the next
thing to try is breaking to the debugger -- which might require
an NMI card -- to see what code it's stuck in during the pause.
It's noticeable - if you type under heavy load in console, you
experience similar to ssh lag - you
If you lean on the keyboard, or if you set up the network adapters
as entropy sources, does the problem fix itself?
If you're thinking it's /dev/random blocking on him, 5.0's output never
blocks. Its output is a PRNG periodically seeded from random data,
including interrupt timings
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Atte Peltomaki wrote:
Description:
Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it
completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so,
everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while compiling
Nate Lawson wrote:
Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it
completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so,
everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while compiling
software and copying files over NFS while listening to
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it
completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so,
everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while compiling
software and
I've used 5.0-RELEASE for few days now, and I've been experiencing some
serious performance problems. I haven't had the time to examine it more
closely, and frankly, I have no clue where to start looking for. Perhaps
someone knows what this is all about.
Description:
Every time machine is under
I hope someone could bring light to what's going on. Alltho I'm not
whining, I knew what I was getting myself into when I installed 5.0, it
would be nice get things solved, for FreeBSD's sake already.
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave things
like this in:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
I hope someone could bring light to what's going on. Alltho I'm not
whining, I knew what I was getting myself into when I installed 5.0, it
would be nice get things solved, for FreeBSD's sake already.
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave
Dan Nelson wrote:
# ls -l /etc/malloc.conf
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf - HR
H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory.
Yes.
R is on
by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and J being on by default.
That's not what the malloc(3) man page
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:14:46PM -0500, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Dan Nelson wrote:
# ls -l /etc/malloc.conf
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf - HR
H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory.
Yes.
R is on
by default in 5.0 anyway,
H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory. R is on
by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and J being on by default. Setting
malloc.conf to aj makes it work like it does in 4.*.
Here are some benchmarks to illustrate that, using ubench (from
/usr/ports/benchmarks) on a dual
Atte Peltomaki wrote:
Description:
Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it
completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so,
everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while compiling
software and copying files over NFS while
In the last episode (Jan 23), Terry Lambert said:
Atte Peltomaki wrote:
Description:
Every time machine is under heavy load (CPU, network, disks) it
completely jamms for fraction of a second for every ten seconds or so,
everything just stops and then continues. I noticed this while
Dan Nelson wrote:
If you lean on the keyboard, or if you set up the network adapters
as entropy sources, does the problem fix itself?
If you're thinking it's /dev/random blocking on him, 5.0's output never
blocks. Its output is a PRNG periodically seeded from random data,
including
Just a me too.
I have a procmail filter that uses spamassissin to filter all my incomming mail
(downloaded with fetchmail). I have noticed that if I get a lot of messages at
once, interactive response degrades tremendously with a lot of perl processes
stuck in either swread or pfault state. The
In the last episode (Jan 23), Rahul Siddharthan said:
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Did you by any chance build your own kernel? If so did you leave
things like this in:
options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity
In the last episode (Jan 23), Rahul Siddharthan said:
Dan Nelson wrote:
# ls -l /etc/malloc.conf
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Jan 23 11:52 /etc/malloc.conf - HR
H and should only make a difference if you are low on memory.
Yes.
R is on
by default in 5.0 anyway, due to A and
19 matches
Mail list logo
