On Friday, 27 August 1999 at 8:55:04 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 16:25:14 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
int devminor; /* minor number */
devminor =
:Greg,
:
:4K is probably too conservative, it only applies if you have a
:swap-backed vn device at the bottom, which would be a truly
:weird thing to do with vinum.
:
:Don't spend too much time on tracking the sector size yet. I think
:the si_bsize stuff needs some thinking before we do more
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
:Greg,
:
:4K is probably too conservative, it only applies if you have a
:swap-backed vn device at the bottom, which would be a truly
:weird thing to do with vinum.
:
:Don't spend too much time on tracking the sector size yet. I think
:the
fixed earlier today...
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
Hi,
Following up my own mail on sig 11 problems, I beleive the
problem is kernel related. Running a kernel with sources current
as of 11:30am EST, I get the following during a make world:
spec_getpages: I/O read
swapping on a vn device?
the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious.
a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that's your
problem.
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
Hi,
Following up my own mail on sig 11 problems, I beleive the
problem is kernel
:swapping on a vn device?
:the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious.
:
:a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that's your
:problem.
A fix was? When? Where? What?
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
The size and resid of 0 is because it decides to use a sectorsize of
zero due to the si_bsize fields being empty.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jul
ian Elischer writes:
swapping on a vn device?
the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious.
a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix
I am positive that I just saw a checkin from phk that
initialised the initial default transfer size.
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:swapping on a vn device?
:the 'size' and 'resid' of 0 looks suspicious.
:
:a fix was just committed to teh vn code that may fix this if that's
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The size and resid of 0 is because it decides to use a sectorsize of
zero due to the si_bsize fields being empty.
yes, but didn't I just see you commit a fix for that?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jul
ian Elischer writes:
swapping on a
which would be this commit...
phk 1999/08/26 07:46:11 PDT
Modified files:
sys/dev/ccd ccd.c
Log:
Initialize the dev-si_bsize fields.
Submitted by: tegge
Reviewed by: phk
Revision ChangesPath
1.53 +5 -1 src/sys/dev/ccd/ccd.c
I need
Ah my mistake, it was ccd. I remembered vn. I guess vinum, vn,
and ccd need all have the correct bisize code..
On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
which would be this commit...
phk 1999/08/26 07:46:11 PDT
Modified files:
sys/dev/ccd ccd.c
Log:
That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures.
You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned.
The fix to ccd deals with a misalignment problem.
But I believe I have found the problem... it is a bug in vm/swap_pager.c
that
The first part of this patch is not yet part of my multipatch at
http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/
This is a tentative fix, but I believe it to be correct. Until
yesterday I was testing swap-backed VN with only one swap partition,
otherwise this would have been found and
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:35:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures.
You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned.
The fix to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Masto writes:
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:35:27PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures.
You will note that with John's
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Well, I just had much the same blowup with source from last night
and I'm using vinum, (and not vn or ccd).
Recompiling now to see if it's still there.
Ok, I havn't touched vinum (grog generally want to do this himself),
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
John W. DeBoskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to figure out why my 11:30am EST cvsup didn't pick
this file up. It's 44 minutes infront of cvsup...
Most mirror sites update themselves hourly from cvsup-master, which
updates itself every 6 minutes from
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Ok, I havn't touched vinum (grog generally want to do this himself),
the fix is probably something like this:
Index: vinum.c
===
RCS file:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Christopher Masto writes:
Index: vinum.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c,v
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -r1.29 vinum.c
--- vinum.c 1999/08/24 02:18:55 1.29
+++ vinum.c
: int devminor; /* minor number */
:
: devminor = minor(dev);
: +dev-si_bsize_phys = DEV_BSIZE;
: +dev-si_bsize_best = BLKDEV_IOSIZE;
: +dev-si_bsize_max = MAXBSIZE;
:
:Bingo! Thank you.
:
:Cool, I expect grog will commit it soon.
:
On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 22:35:27 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
That fixes a problem with ccd, but not the one causing John's failures.
You will note that with John's failure's the I/O is properly page-aligned.
The fix to
Hi,
Sorry for taking so long to reply. I have an isdn line to my office
which has been acting up lately (or should I say acting down?).
Anyways, yes, I am using a ccd. I also have a machine with a
dpt raid4 controller that I probably need to check to see if
it still works
My setup
On Thursday, 26 August 1999 at 16:25:14 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
int devminor; /* minor number */
devminor = minor(dev);
+dev-si_bsize_phys = DEV_BSIZE;
+dev-si_bsize_best = BLKDEV_IOSIZE;
+dev-si_bsize_max = MAXBSIZE;
Bingo!
23 matches
Mail list logo
