Re: Bad performance

2003-09-18 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:15:50PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: sebastian ssmoller wrote: here is my lmmon output. Motherboard Temp Voltages 255C / 491F / 528KVcore1: +3.984V Vcore2: +3.984V Fan Speeds + 3.3V: +3.984V

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread sebastian ssmoller
here is my vmstat -i output: interrupt total rate stray irq01 0 stray irq71 0 npx0 irq131 0 ata0 irq1492143 2 ata1 irq15

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread sebastian ssmoller
(...) hi, I agree with the general concensus that this shows all the symptoms of a network or DNS problem - though the switch from SIS to nVidia may have disturbed X. Did you change any system configuration (hostname etc) when you moved the disk? Is the 'production' environment identical

RE: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Don Bowman
From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two times faster as before (!) (30s - 15-17s) can anyone explain me why, pls ? I wonder how hot your processor is? perhaps ACPI is throttling the clock back, either duty cycle or

RE: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote: From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two times faster as before (!) (30s - 15-17s) can anyone explain me why, pls ? I wonder how hot your processor is? perhaps

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:05:59PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: as mentioned: really bad performace occurs when lauching mozilla, gaim, gnome2, etc. ... when mozilla is running the perfomance seems to be ok ... possibly a bit too slow but i do not know how to proof this (?) I discovered

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: Motherboard Temp Voltages 255C / 491F / 528KVcore1: +3.984V Vcore2: +3.984V Fan Speeds + 3.3V: +3.984V + 5.0V: +6.654V

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: Motherboard Temp Voltages 255C / 491F / 528KVcore1: +3.984V Vcore2: +3.984V Fan Speeds + 3.3V:

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:31:52PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote: I wonder how hot your processor is? perhaps ACPI is throttling the clock back, either duty cycle or frequency. In your bios you can set the power mode, perhaps you can set

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Scott Long
sebastian ssmoller wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 20:16, Don Bowman wrote: From: sebastian ssmoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... i turned of acpi on startup an voila :) : gdm starts two times faster as before (!) (30s - 15-17s) can anyone explain me why, pls ? I wonder how hot your processor is?

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-17 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:19:38PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: (...) btw: the mozilla-firebird performance problem mention earlier seems to be something different: firebird launches relativly fast and as soon as running i can us the menus and everything which is reachable via mouse. but

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-15 Thread Sean Chittenden
i recently switched from mandrake to freebsd. i used a second system, to install freebsd 5.1 (release) on a 15 gb western digital disk. i installed the whole system without problems and managed to start gdm and gnome2. everything worked fine and performance (launching gdm, gnome2 and

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-14 Thread Sebastian Ssmoller
hi, i did a lot of changes and tests last night :) -u were right there was a bug in the network config (i fixed some named entries) now netstat -r is really fast (no timeouts which occured before) -i wrote a simple c test program using gethostname, gethostbyname, gethostbyaddr as suggested it

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:52, sebastian ssmoller wrote: hi, i recently switched from mandrake to freebsd. i used a second system, to install freebsd 5.1 (release) on a 15 gb western digital disk. i installed the whole system without problems and managed to start gdm and gnome2.

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 15:08, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: On Saturday 13 September 2003 14:52, sebastian ssmoller wrote: hi, i recently switched from mandrake to freebsd. i used a second system, to install freebsd 5.1 (release) on a 15 gb western digital disk. i installed the whole system

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 13 Sep 2003 14:52:29 +0200 sebastian ssmoller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then i moved the disk from the hardware used during install into the production environment which includes VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) board, NVidia GeForce2 grafic card (using nvidia native driver for x11), AMD Duron

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 16:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 13 Sep 2003 14:52:29 +0200 sebastian ssmoller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then i moved the disk from the hardware used during install into the production environment which includes VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) board, NVidia GeForce2

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread sebastian ssmoller
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 16:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 13 Sep 2003 14:52:29 +0200 sebastian ssmoller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then i moved the disk from the hardware used during install into the production environment which includes VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) board, NVidia GeForce2

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
On Saturday 13 September 2003 18:05, sebastian ssmoller wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 16:34, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 13 Sep 2003 14:52:29 +0200 sebastian ssmoller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: then i moved the disk from the hardware used during install into the production environment

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Fred Souza
I have the same southbridge and a very fast system. That can't be the problem - and it really does sound like a network problem. It looks like it's looking for a host that it can't find. Possibly your own hostname. I've seen a problem somewhat like that one if portmap/rpcbind is not

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Arjan van Leeuwen
as mentioned: really bad performace occurs when lauching mozilla, gaim, gnome2, etc. ... when mozilla is running the perfomance seems to be ok ... possibly a bit too slow but i do not know how to proof this (?) i suppose a udma/disk/controller problem. i found out that the

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Fred Souza
i guess portmapper is not runing. whats the name of the rc.d script on fbsd ? i looked for portmap (as under linux) but haven't found in /etc/rc.d ... If you're running 4.x, it's portmap. If it's 5.x, it's rpcbind. To have it loaded at boot-time, just put rpcbind_enable=YES into your

Re: Bad performance

2003-09-13 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 02:52:29PM +0200, sebastian ssmoller wrote: then i moved the disk from the hardware used during install into the production environment which includes VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) ... everything worked fine again. BUT: launching gdm needs a lot of time, same for gnome2. when