Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-12 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Nate Williams wrote: The changes to pccardd to support the new 'inactive' flag are still missing. We can power the slot on/off, but pccardd is unaware of these changes. Doesn't it need to be aware of the new 'power' state? Hmm. I looked pccard in PAO but it is complex in state treatment.

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-12 Thread Brian Feldman
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, Jun Kuriyama wrote: Nate Williams wrote: The changes to pccardd to support the new 'inactive' flag are still missing. We can power the slot on/off, but pccardd is unaware of these changes. Doesn't it need to be aware of the new 'power' state? Hmm. I looked

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-08 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Thank you for your comment. Mike Smith wrote: But this diagram worries me. Does this explicitly disallow physical removal without a preceeding virtual removal? No. This is for card such as: o Some cards go unstable when it is removed from slot with power on. But turning off the power

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-08 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Thank you for your comment. Nate Williams wrote: The patch implementing these changes are adequate in the kernel, but are incomplete. Yes, I should have attached patch for usr.sbin/pccard/* too. What about the changes to usr.sbin/pccard/*? With regard to the power-on modifications, it is

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-08 Thread Nate Williams
Nate Williams wrote: The patch implementing these changes are adequate in the kernel, but are incomplete. Yes, I should have attached patch for usr.sbin/pccard/* too. The changes to pccardd to support the new 'inactive' flag are still missing. We can power the slot on/off, but pccardd is

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-07 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Jun Kuriyama wrote: I'm planning to commit these changes into src/sys/pccard/. This adds two features. These features are obtained from PAO. Sorry, I forgot to add patch. :-) -- Jun Kuriyama // kuriy...@sky.rim.or.jp // kuriy...@freebsd.orgIndex: cardinfo.h

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-07 Thread Nate Williams
I'm planning to commit these changes into src/sys/pccard/. This adds two features. These features are obtained from PAO. o PIOCSVIR ... o PIOCSBEEP ... The patch implementing these changes are adequate in the kernel, but are incomplete. What about the changes to usr.sbin/pccard/*?

Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/*

1999-02-07 Thread Mike Smith
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --6331448DC47966073EBB6A88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jun Kuriyama wrote: I'm planning to commit these changes into src/sys/pccard/. This adds two features. These features are