Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-28 Thread Doug Rabson
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes: > : Just as a BTW, dfr and sos are exchanging patches right now (and have been > : for quite a few days) that happen to fix the inthand_add() stuff. > > This may also help the pccard code cases which I ha

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-27 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Wemm writes: : Just as a BTW, dfr and sos are exchanging patches right now (and have been : for quite a few days) that happen to fix the inthand_add() stuff. This may also help the pccard code cases which I have floating around. Warner To Unsubscribe: send

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-23 Thread Peter Wemm
Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > > > If you looked at the code, you would see that the ata driver only uses > > > this ugly method when we are dealing with the standard primary & > > > secondary controller which are bound to specific addresses and int

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-23 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > > > If you looked at the code, you would see that the ata driver only uses > > > this ugly method when we are dealing with the standard primary & > > > secondary controller which are bound to specific

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > If you looked at the code, you would see that the ata driver only uses > > this ugly method when we are dealing with the standard primary & > > secondary controller which are bound to specific addresses and interrupts. > > Those are not configurabl

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > If you looked at the code, you would see that the ata driver only uses > this ugly method when we are dealing with the standard primary & > secondary controller which are bound to specific addresses and interrupts. > Those are not configurable. That's why the resource manager allows y

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Bill Paul wrote: [snip snap] > I don't want to sound like an ungrateful wretch, unduly criticizing > someone else's code, especially at so late a date, but there are some > other things that just seem like they really shouldn't be there: We've got used to it, on with matters... > -