Julian Elischer wrote:
I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Very cool!
None of these are dangerous for the stuff I've done so far.
Someone else anticipated the question I was going to ask: thanks
for the patch, too!
-- Terry
To
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Julian,
This is way cool stuff. I assume these are done based on i386 stack frame
layouts? Running on other platforms will result in different
At 11:29 AM -0400 8/16/01, Robert Watson wrote:
This is way cool stuff. I assume these are done based on i386 stack frame
layouts? Running on other platforms will result in different alignment
(minor issue, as most of the time it will just be a few bytes here or
there), and some different code
May I ask where to get this utility?
Thanks!
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
I tried it ou ton a compile of GENERIC.
it produced some 360 functions that allocate over 100 bytes on
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, Rex Luo wrote:
May I ask where to get this utility?
Thanks!
It's beeing added to gcc in -current..
here are my patches: WARNING..CUT_N_PASTE.. will not patch cleanly.
Index: calls.c
===
RCS file:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:00:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I ported the code to allow gcc to report functions that use too much
of our 3.4KB kernel stacks.
Actually I thought I did. :-) Is your final patch different from the
one I did and sent you?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
I guess so, I started from the code that was on the gcc web page..
did you send me something new?
(I sent you a copy of the final version.. di you miss it?
I missed yours :-)
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:00:50PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I ported
