Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-15 Thread Mark Murray
> Sound okay to everyone? Fine by me! :-) M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-15 Thread Mark Murray
> Sounds great. I hope this means I get to import OpenSSH! Hell, yes! I reckon it may be better to let me do it; that way I can get Internat and Freefall synchronised. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsu

Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On 10 Dec 1999, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > I have it building fine, although compiling without RSA seems > > broken in openssl 0.9.4. > > Well, it works fine in the OpenBSD tree. You might want to take a > look at what's been done there. Yes, I just haven't had the time to check yet. The i

Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-10 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have it building fine, although compiling without RSA seems > broken in openssl 0.9.4. Well, it works fine in the OpenBSD tree. You might want to take a look at what's been done there. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-10 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > Why don't you want libssl, too? If we don't have that, then we'll > end up having to install the port for using SSL and there will be > redundancy (wasted space) and two copies of OpenSSL to maintain, > still. Since it wasn't going to be u

Re: OpenSSL update

1999-12-09 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Due to time constraints (exams) I haven't been able to do much more > towards the OpenSSL build infrastructure (specifically, jumping through > the requisite hoops for US stupidity). I have it building fine, although > compiling without RSA seems broken