Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-10 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: > > > A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. > > > After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. > > > > > > I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up t

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-09 Thread Thyer, Matthew
> John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: [snip] > > > Excuse me while I go outside and shoot myself. > > > > Hahahaha! > > > > Glad to see you have fixed them. :) > > Unfortunately, there are still more problems. :-( > > I have found some of them. And what is really sc

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-09 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/07/08 13:52), Peter Wemm wrote: > I have found some of them. And what is really scary is that I have > verified that some of what Terry has been FUD'ing(*) about for our TLB > (mis)management is actually correct. :-( Ha! Justice! All those who slapped me around on IRC for defending

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread Peter Wemm
John Baldwin wrote: > > On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: > > A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. > > After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. > > > > I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem): > > >

RE: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote: > A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. > After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. > > I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem): > > pmap_mapdev() > ... > for

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread Julian Elischer
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Xu wrote: > > sorry for a bit OT, but why are pmap_mapdev and pmap_unmapdev still using > old C language parameter style? I saw other functions in pmap using ANSI > C style. > because until recently it was not 'kosher' to change them, but thank god we have now got p

Re: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-08 Thread David Xu
Gartner: Apache is vulnerable, we recommend switching back to IIS to protect yourselves - Original Message - From: "Peter Wemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:28 PM Subject: Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizat

Remember my ill-fated i386 smp pmap optimizations?

2002-07-07 Thread Peter Wemm
A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations. After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely. I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem): pmap_mapdev() ... for (tmpva = va; size > 0; ) { pte =