> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Brian Somers wrote:
>
> BS>The intent is to discover whether there's a filesystem yet (vn_open()
> BS>will die horribly otherwise).
> BS>
> BS>My use of rootdev is (obviously) flawed. AFAICT, either rootvp
> BS>or rootvnode should be used, but I can't tell the difference b
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Brian Somers wrote:
BS>The intent is to discover whether there's a filesystem yet (vn_open()
BS>will die horribly otherwise).
BS>
BS>My use of rootdev is (obviously) flawed. AFAICT, either rootvp
BS>or rootvnode should be used, but I can't tell the difference between
BS>the
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harti Brandt write
> s:
> >the check for rootdev != NODEV introduced in rev 1.88 breaks loading of
> >kernel modules from an NFS mounted root in diskless configurations.
> >Dropping in gdb and printing rootdev shows -1 which is, I assume, NODEV.
>
> Ah, that woul
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harti Brandt write
s:
>the check for rootdev != NODEV introduced in rev 1.88 breaks loading of
>kernel modules from an NFS mounted root in diskless configurations.
>Dropping in gdb and printing rootdev shows -1 which is, I assume, NODEV.
Ah, that would explain a pr
Hello,
the check for rootdev != NODEV introduced in rev 1.88 breaks loading of
kernel modules from an NFS mounted root in diskless configurations.
Dropping in gdb and printing rootdev shows -1 which is, I assume, NODEV.
This worked before without problems.
harti
--
harti brandt, http://www.fok
