On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Florian Ermisch <
florian.ermi...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 11. Juni 2016 18:31:25 MESZ, schrieb Alan Somers :
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Domagoj Stolfa
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with
> > >
Am 11. Juni 2016 18:31:25 MESZ, schrieb Alan Somers :
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Domagoj Stolfa
> wrote:
> > Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with
> > capsicum(4), but glancing over it, it might be possible. If
> anything, it
> > would allow for code reuse f
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Domagoj Stolfa
wrote:
> Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with
> capsicum(4), but glancing over it, it might be possible. If anything, it
> would allow for code reuse from the OpenBSD ports and increased portability
> in the future. May
Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with
capsicum(4), but glancing over it, it might be possible. If anything, it
would allow for code reuse from the OpenBSD ports and increased portability
in the future. Maybe the people who have worked with capsicum(4) or have
developed
Am 11. Juni 2016 12:38:34 MESZ, schrieb Wolfgang Zenker
:
> Hi,
>
> * Domagoj Stolfa [160611 02:47]:
> > Has there been discussion on the OpenBSD's pledge going into the
> FreeBSD
> > kernel as an atomic syscall or as a MAC plugin?
>
> I don't remember any discussions about this, but looking at
Hi,
* Domagoj Stolfa [160611 02:47]:
> Has there been discussion on the OpenBSD's pledge going into the FreeBSD
> kernel as an atomic syscall or as a MAC plugin?
I don't remember any discussions about this, but looking at OpenBSDs
plege(2) manpage, isn't this something going in the same directio
Has there been discussion on the OpenBSD's pledge going into the FreeBSD
kernel as an atomic syscall or as a MAC plugin?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
