Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 9:21 PM -0400 2000/7/3, Will Andrews wrote:
Does anyone else here think this is a good idea?
If you're looking for votes, you've got mine.
BTW, will this play nicely with -h? Consider me stupid if you
yes since all internal
hi everybody and Happy New Year,
anybody to commit http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=19635 ?
one of the reasons it was not commited was due to an overflow problem
which has been fixed since.
thanks by advance..
Cyrille.
--
home: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] work: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
[snip]
Filesystem1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s2a 44650330922 379861 8%/
/dev/ad0s9e 1453615 758910 57841657%/usr
/dev/ad0s9f
Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:47:25 -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 04:06:46PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
My only objection is that it seems to produce useless values. Can you
think of a use for these grand totals?
They are
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote:
this number is completely useless to me. I have to agree with Sheldon, where
is the use to this number?
Think about doing something like
$ df -c/disk0 /disk1 /disk2 ... /diskX
To
As a side issue, can anyone explain these peculiar results from df(1)'s
huamn-readable (-h) output:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%/tmp
/dev/ad0s1f 1.2G 934M 241M80%/usr
/dev/ad0s1e
+[ Sheldon Hearn ]-
|
| As a side issue, can anyone explain these peculiar results from df(1)'s
| huamn-readable (-h) output:
|
| Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
| mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 20:48:46 +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
Those are block available to non-superuser I think, not "just available"
There's some amount reserved (10% ?).
Duh. Classic mistake in disguise. :-)
Sorry to trouble.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
At 12:41 PM +0200 2000/7/6, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
mfs:26 87M11K80M 0%/tmp
/dev/ad0s1f 1.2G 934M 241M80%/usr
/dev/ad0s1e 193M92M86M52%/var
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:26:00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
beancounters don't understand that computers can have more than one disk let
alone multiple slices. so it gives a nice total number to slap into a pie
chart so that you can requisition more hard drives for your machines.
This
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:26:00 -0400, Brian Hechinger wrote:
beancounters don't understand that computers can have more than one disk let
alone multiple slices. so it gives a nice total number to slap into a pie
chart so that you can
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
the other.
How about precedent: du -c. "Hey, we could have used an awk script with
du(1) too!!"
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
the other.
Spoiler:
df /disk1 /disk2 | \
awk '/^\// {t+=$2;u+=$3;} END { print "Total:",
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 06:09:54PM +0200, Paul Herman wrote:
Naturally, "no reason not to put it in" is most certainly *not* a
reason to put it in. I would like to hear some to sway me one way or
the other.
[...]
[hawk-billf] /home/billf
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 09:56:43PM +0200, Blaz Zupan wrote:
Ok, so let's say my / is 100% full, my /usr is 50% full and my /var is 20%
full. What would the total number tell me? That my file systems are 56.6%
full. That tells me nothing about my root file system running out of space, so
this
At 9:21 PM -0400 2000/7/3, Will Andrews wrote:
Does anyone else here think this is a good idea?
If you're looking for votes, you've got mine.
BTW, will this play nicely with -h? Consider me stupid if you
like, but I've recently been re-re-re-re-reading the man pages for
On Mon, 03 Jul 2000 21:21:52 -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
Does anyone else here think this is a good idea? If so, I'd like to
merge this in -CURRENT and MFC before 4.1-RELEASE. It seems like a
fairly nice addition to df(1), and can be useful for system accounting.
My only objection is that
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 04:06:46PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
My only objection is that it seems to produce useless values. Can you
think of a use for these grand totals?
They are helpful for monitoring total space; I would use them in
administrative scripts to watch my space.
Granted, this
They are helpful for monitoring total space; I would use them in
administrative scripts to watch my space.
Ok, so let's say my / is 100% full, my /usr is 50% full and my /var is 20%
full. What would the total number tell me? That my file systems are 56.6%
full. That tells me nothing about my
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:47:25 -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 04:06:46PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
My only objection is that it seems to produce useless values. Can you
think of a use for these grand totals?
They are helpful for monitoring total space; I would use
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 10:34:41PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Okay, then. Let me be more specific. How is the notion of "total
space" useful? :-)
Tells you when it's time to get new hard drives?
I guess the originator of the PR should provide a reason. =\
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000 22:34:41 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
They are helpful for monitoring total space; I would use them in
administrative scripts to watch my space.
Okay, then. Let me be more specific. How is the notion of "total
space" useful? :-)
exactly. It will be more of
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 07:58:17AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Synopsis: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does
Description:
sample of output :
# df -c
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a 1904559 1249983 50221271%
On Tue, Jul 04, 2000 at 03:32:11PM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
My only suggestion is to put a dashed line above the totals in order to
clearly say they are totals (like I did below).
That might be nice, but I object on the grounds that it isn't consistent
with du -c.
--
Will Andrews [EMAIL
24 matches
Mail list logo
