Re: latest -current broke netscape's name lookup?

2001-11-04 Thread Bill Fenner
awk does not copy input lines to its output unless asked; you can ask with either an explicit print or an empty action. Using an input file like: gibberish stuff this doesn't match here is some garbola I don't want this file in the ouptut here's some more stuff and another line and another and

Re: latest -current broke netscape's name lookup?

2001-11-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of course, one of the other interesting issues with the above patch is that awk was whining about the empty regex (//). Since the idea was apparently to do nothing for such a record,

Re: latest -current broke netscape's name lookup?

2001-11-02 Thread David Wolfskill
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 03 Nov 2001 03:34:01 +0100 course, one of the other interesting issues with the above patch is that awk was whining about the empty regex (//). Since the idea was apparently to do nothing for such a record, it seemed simpler to just not tell

Re: latest -current broke netscape's name lookup?

2001-11-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, I tried that. Maybe I should have put it in braces, but I thought I tried that, too. Hmmm... I can hack on the build machine a bit... I was aware that sed, by default, would print its input to output, but had thought that awk would