On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote:
vi -- which is in /usr.
Good example of something else that would be great to have in /bin.
*ducking*
--
Ben Rosengart
and as a coworker, I'd have to tell you how to use cat ;)
ROTFL.
-Pat
__
Pat Lynch
David Scheidt wrote:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
They try to map graphs into a line.
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
who is as social as a wampas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 06:21:48 +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
@@ -344,7 +352,7 @@
tools::
.for _tool in ${_strfile} ${_aout_tools} usr.bin/gensetdefs \
gnu/usr.bin/binutils usr.bin/objformat usr.bin/yacc usr.bin/colldef \
-gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc
+gnu/usr.bin/bison
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
Yea... been hearing that for 4 years... one of it's big short comings is
that it needs a persistent backing store for this. Sounds like this C
program could fullfill one of the missing parts of devfs :-)
F persistent backing store. The daemon solution is perfectly
On 1999-Dec-15 19:57:49 +1100, Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc
+gnu/usr.bin/bison gnu/usr.bin/cc gnu/usr.bin/texinfo
Presumably this hunk is a stray fix for something other than the fortune
database? :-)
Yes it is. I was having problems with
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dav
id Scheidt writes:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
runlevels are a very oldfashioned way to think about things, I
David Scheidt wrote:
What's wrong with run with system V runlevels? Other than it's system V and
everything AT^HUSL did is evil, of course.
Well, the one danger is that we'd be slowly drifting away from
the classic BSD way of doing thigs. Of course, the official BSD
is dead (right?). But
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 01:22:46AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
runlevels, OpenBSD does not or goes with an entirely different
system), them would it be fair to consider FreeBSD "BSD"? The
advantage here is that FreeBSD would mature into it's own type of
UNIX with a BSD heritage.
Can we
Peter Wemm wrote:
I wonder if we should move fortune to usr.bin? It's hardly a game and I'm
way beyond tired of it being left out of standard paths...
(ie: "/bin:/usr/bin[:/usr/local/bin]")
After letting this go through my head for a day (it probably isn't
important anymore :-), I think
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
So how about /usr/sbin/chown - /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with
just the root file system mounted?
How about removing awk from MAKEDEV so life isn't so hard to recover
when you use a 3.3 fixit floppy after removing /dev and not making
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
So how about /usr/sbin/chown - /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with
just the root file system mounted?
As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes.
As one who's missed chown at
:
: So how about /usr/sbin/chown - /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with
: just the root file system mounted?
:
: As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes.
:
:As one who's missed chown at times when only root's mounted, I'm with Bill.
:
:--
: Ben Rosengart
:
:UNIX
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
I think at one time or another all of us have missed *something* in
/usr that wasn't in /. For example, disklabel -e doesn't work without
vi -- which is in /usr.
EDITOR=/bin/ed
export EDITOR
disklabel -e
[Recipient list trimmed down to just the list. dhw]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 19:38:32 +0100
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would make more sense, considering the way FreeBSD is distributed for
/usr/local to be a mountpoint than for /usr to be a mountpoint.
It's hardly
On 1999-Dec-13 20:42:36 +1100, Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Index: Makefile.inc1
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v
retrieving revision 1.106
diff -u -r1.106 Makefile.inc1
--- Makefile.inc1 1999/12/12
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 10:32:23AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
: So how about /usr/sbin/chown - /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with
: just the root file system mounted?
:
: As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes.
:
:As one who's missed chown at times when
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 07:38:32PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes:
I think at one time or another all of us have missed *something* in
/usr that wasn't in /. For example, disklabel -e doesn't work without
vi -- which is in
How about removing awk from MAKEDEV so life isn't so hard to recover
when you use a 3.3 fixit floppy after removing /dev and not making
enough of it again.
How about finally starting to work on devfs and forget about all the
MAKEDEV junk and leave it as it is for now?
Blaz Zupan, [EMAIL
"BSDman" == BSDman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BSDman one idea about /usr is to allow the admin to mount it
BSDman read-only. I didn't tried it but this would give some
BSDman level of security against modifications of the files there
BSDman in.
This is particulary useful in a
[.]
On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this
madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today,
[.]
*cough*DEVFS*cough*
--
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Awfulhak.org
[.]
On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this
madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today,
[.]
*cough*DEVFS*cough*
Yea... been hearing that for 4 years... one of it's big short comings is
that it needs a persistent backing
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 01:39:28AM +, Brian Somers wrote:
[.]
On a related subject: don't you think it's high time to end up this
madness with MAKEDEV being a shell script, and reimplement it in C? Today,
[.]
*cough*DEVFS*cough*
Gesunteit.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
:
:Poul-Henning Kamp wrote
: It would make more sense, considering the way FreeBSD is distributed for
: /usr/local to be a mountpoint than for /usr to be a mountpoint.
:
: /var is traditionally a mountpoint to keep the logs out of harms
: way (and vice versa), but /usr never had that level of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brian Somers writes:
: *cough*DEVFS*cough*
devfs*D*
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Peter Jeremy wrote:
=== games/fortune/datfiles
PATH=$PATH:/usr/games:/usr/obj/3.0/cvs/src/games/fortune/datfiles/../strfile
strfile -Crs /3.0/cvs/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes fortunes.dat
strfile: illegal option -- C
strfile [-iorsx] [-c char] sourcefile [datafile]
*** Error code 1
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 10:42:36 +0100, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
I think the easiest solution would be (instead of your patches of
course):
-STRICTTMPPATH= ${WORLDTMP}/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/bin
+STRICTTMPPATH= ${WORLDTMP}/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/games
Only if you preceded the
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999 10:42:36 +0100, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
I think the easiest solution would be (instead of your patches of
course):
-STRICTTMPPATH= ${WORLDTMP}/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/bin
+STRICTTMPPATH= ${WORLDTMP}/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/bin:${WORLDTMP}/usr/games
Only if you
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
I wonder if we should move fortune to usr.bin? It's hardly a game and I'm
way beyond tired of it being left out of standard paths...
(ie: "/bin:/usr/bin[:/usr/local/bin]")
I have no opinion about fortune, but I do think that md5 should be moved
from
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
I wonder if we should move fortune to usr.bin? It's hardly a game and I'm
way beyond tired of it being left out of standard paths...
(ie: "/bin:/usr/bin[:/usr/local/bin]")
I have no opinion about
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
I wonder if we should move fortune to usr.bin? It's hardly a game and I'm
way beyond tired of it being left out of standard paths...
(ie: "/bin:/usr/bin[:/usr/local/bin]")
I have no opinion
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
So how about /usr/sbin/chown - /sbin/chown so that MAKEDEV works with
just the root file system mounted?
As one who just got his ass bitten by this, I would vote yes.
--
- bill fumerola - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
-
I'm still running a -CURRENT from just before the signal changes and
for the past 4 days, my nightly buildworld has been dying at follows:
=== games/fortune/datfiles
PATH=$PATH:/usr/games:/usr/obj/3.0/cvs/src/games/fortune/datfiles/../strfile st
rfile -Crs
On 1999-Dec-13 11:06:19 +1100, I wrote:
I'm still running a -CURRENT from just before the signal changes and
for the past 4 days, my nightly buildworld has been dying at follows:
=== games/fortune/datfiles
PATH=$PATH:/usr/games:/usr/obj/3.0/cvs/src/games/fortune/datfiles/../strfile strfile
-Crs
On 1999-Dec-13 11:06:19 +1100, I wrote:
I'm still running a -CURRENT from just before the signal changes and
for the past 4 days, my nightly buildworld has been dying at follows:
=== games/fortune/datfiles
PATH=$PATH:/usr/games:/usr/obj/3.0/cvs/src/games/fortune/datfiles/../strfile strfile
-Crs
34 matches
Mail list logo
