Re: mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-20 Thread Matt Dillon
:You can create an MD partition with wired memory - no swap backing :at all, if you want. Obviously you can make such a partition as :large as you might otherwise want to make it. Er, I meant can't, not can... with wired memory there are some severe limitations to how

Re: mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-20 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 19 Jun, Matt Dillon wrote: : The swap backing in md(4) is a straight copy of the code which : lived in vn(4). I'm not terribly familiar with that code, but I : would expect that it would work with no swap space as well. : : Your man is probably Matt Dillon... You can create

Re: mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-19 Thread Mikhail Teterin
So, Matt, any comments? On 7 Jun, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mikhail Teterin writes: When I moved to mdconfig, I figured I have to use ``-t swap'' for the same effect, but it seems, I was wrong -- apparently, ``swap'' means the filesystem will always

Re: mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-19 Thread Matt Dillon
:So, Matt, any comments? : :On 7 Jun, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], : Mikhail Teterin writes: : :... : : The swap backing in md(4) is a straight copy of the code which lived : in vn(4). I'm not terribly familiar with that code, but I would expect : that it

Re: mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mikhail Teterin write s: When I moved to mdconfig, I figured I have to use ``-t swap'' for the same effect, but it seems, I was wrong -- apparently, ``swap'' means the filesystem will always hit the disk, even if there is plenty of RAM to go around. My

mdconfig and _virtual_ memory

2001-06-06 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Hi! For years of using MFS I presumed, that it used virtual memory -- RAM and swap to store the file system -- using RAM for speed of MFS and swap when RAM was needed by others. When I moved to mdconfig, I figured I have to use ``-t swap'' for the same effect, but it seems, I was wrong --