In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Luoqi Chen writes:
I'd like to add something about the last buffer wouldn't sync. This occurs
when a shutdown syscall is issued when the syncer process is asleep waiting
for a buffer write to complete. The write will never complete, because the
syncer won't be given
Most probably this is exactly the problem I was describing to you a
couple of days ago on IRC, phk.
The solution is to boot single user, fsck / and reboot. After that
things are back to normal. Even crashing the machine does not make this
problem reoccur.
Nah. This is about the
Happens to me every boot. And I'm up to date with all binaries and kernel.
I don't have softupdates on the root filesystem.
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
Most probably this is exactly the problem I was describing to you a
couple of days
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
I've seen this exact same thing before too. In fact it was two rather
annoying things, one being a single solitary last buffer that wouldn't
sync and thus left the whole fs marked dirty, and then fsck would check
it, see it was fine, but mount
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
Most probably this is exactly the problem I was describing to you a
couple of days ago on IRC, phk.
The solution is to boot single user, fsck / and reboot. After that
things are back to normal. Even
I'd like to add something about the last buffer wouldn't sync. This occurs
when a shutdown syscall is issued when the syncer process is asleep waiting
for a buffer write to complete. The write will never complete, because the
syncer won't be given a chance to run again, and the buffer will
That sounds like the conclusion I came to as well. I had a different
patch, but looking at yours, mine looks wrong.
Nick
"mount -f /" on a dirty root file system causes the clean flag to stay off
forever. (I forgot to change the unclean flag for mount -u.)
diff -c2 ffs_vfsops.c~
Please update your /dev entries. You need to copy MAKEDEV from the
source area (it isn't installed by default) and run it with the right
arguments to recreate the device nodes you need.
I've seen this exact same thing before too. In fact it was two rather
annoying things, one being a
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
Most probably this is exactly the problem I was describing to you a
couple of days ago on IRC, phk.
The solution is to boot single user, fsck / and reboot. After that
things are back to normal. Even crashing the machine does not make this
problem
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Nick Hibma wrote:
Most probably this is exactly the problem I was describing to you a
couple of days ago on IRC, phk.
The solution is to boot single user, fsck / and reboot. After that
things are back to normal. Even crashing the machine does not make this
-On [19991206 00:00], Khetan Gajjar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
* Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by `make install' in a kernel
compilation directory?
Afaik, anyone tracking -current either knows to do this or
uses a tool (like mergemaster) that does it for
I've seen this exact same thing before too. In fact it was two rather
annoying things, one being a single solitary last buffer that wouldn't
sync and thus left the whole fs marked dirty, and then fsck would check
it, see it was fine, but mount wouldn't recognize that it was clean.
'Course
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vallo Kallaste writes:
On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 08:01:43PM -0800, "Brian W. Buchanan"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After an unfortunate hard reboot today, the system fscked everything and
then barfed attempting to mount /, claiming it to be unclean. I dropped
to
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 11:12:29AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please update your /dev entries. You need to copy MAKEDEV from the
source area (it isn't installed by default) and run it with the right
arguments to recreate the device nodes you need.
Thanks, that was
Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?
Leif
- Original Message -
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please update your /dev entries. You need to copy MAKEDEV from the
source area (it isn't installed by default) and run it with the right
arguments to recreate
In message 003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Leif Neland" writes:
Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?
I'm actually starting to wonder about that too...
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Leif Neland" writes:
Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?
I'm actually starting to wonder about that too...
Just like with the base KLDs, I really think this should be installed
On Sun, 05 Dec 1999 21:14:12 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In message 003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Leif Neland" writes:
Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?
I'm actually starting to wonder about that too...
Um, the correct question would have
In message 003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Leif Neland" writes:
Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world?
I'm actually starting to wonder about that too...
Because the source is buried in src/etc, and src/etc is not run as
a SUBDIR target. It had always been my intent
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Same here, except I'm able to mount after fscking an rebooting. ATA disk
and new ata drivers.
Please update your /dev entries. You need to copy MAKEDEV from the
source area (it isn't installed by default) and run it with the right
arguments to
After an unfortunate hard reboot today, the system fscked everything and
then barfed attempting to mount /, claiming it to be unclean. I dropped
to single-user mode and proceeded to re-fsck / and then tried to mount it
again to no avail. Rebooting didn't help things either.
# fsck -p
21 matches
Mail list logo
