Hajimu UMEMOTO schrieb:
Hi,
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
Any comment?
I have done a similar approach. I was inspired by the "vmstat -s" output of
Solaris.
Therefor my solution was integrated into t
Hi,
I received the patch to add counter for fork() set from Paul. I've
tested it on my -CURRENT and -STABLE boxes, and it seems fine for me.
So, I post his patch for review.
Thanks, Paul.
fork.patch.gz
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
* Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010116 10:33] wrote:
Hi,
I received the patch to add counter for fork() set from Paul. I've
tested it on my -CURRENT and -STABLE boxes, and it seems fine for me.
So, I post his patch for review.
Thanks, Paul.
I like this a lot.
--
-Alfred Perlstein
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
I received the patch to add counter for fork() set from Paul. I've
tested it on my -CURRENT and -STABLE boxes, and it seems fine for me.
So, I post his patch for review.
I do have a change (I knew I forgot something.)
This is exactly the same
Hi,
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
Any comment?
Index: lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3
diff -u lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3.orig lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3
--- lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3.orig Fri Jan 12 02:39:22 2001
+++ lib/libc/gen/sysctl.3
Hi,
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:06:18 -0800
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bright * Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010115 10:00] wrote:
Hi,
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
Any comment?
bright Why
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
I think dynamic sysctl is useful for dynamic context. But, here is
just static and it seems there is no advantage. Isn't it?
That sounds to me like a wholly dynamic thing. I mean the amount of forks
since boot can rise
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
bright * Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010115 10:00] wrote:
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
Any comment?
I like the idea, but this belongs in vmeter with context
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:46:32 +0100 (CET)
Paul Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pherman On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
bright * Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010115 10:00] wrote:
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:46:32 +0100 (CET)
Paul Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pherman I like the idea, but this belongs in vmeter with context switches,
pherman page faults, etc, doesn't it? This is how OpenBSD does it, anyway.
I see.
You mean
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:07:08 +0100 (CET)
Paul Herman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pherman Yes, that's my read from the source. What I also like about it is
pherman that it counts [vr]forks to boot, plus vmpages affected by the fork.
pherman After I first saw this in OBSD I was really motivated to
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
Any comment?
Index: sys/kern/kern_fork.c
diff -u sys/kern/kern_fork.c.orig sys/kern/kern_fork.c
--- sys/kern/kern_fork.c.orig Fri
On 2001-Jan-15 23:24:22 +0100, Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
...
+static unsigned int nforks = 0;
+SYSCTL_UINT(_kern, KERN_NFORKS, nforks, CTLFLAG_RD, nforks, 0, "");
If any, I think this should be long, otherwise on machines like web
13 matches
Mail list logo
