On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:16:30 pm Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:25:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 08:43:52AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:16:30 pm Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:25:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:18:05:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
dhcp option in rc.conf).
Am I
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
LS dhcp option in rc.conf).
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with synchronous
LS dhcp option in
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not
Hello, John.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 17:34:31:
JB Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
JB dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
JB be started by rc, but would be restarted by devd).
It is strange, and,
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:04 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, John.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 17:34:31:
JB Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
JB dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
JB be
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:16:03:
IL It has worked this way for me for years. Does it somehow not work this
IL way for everyone?
Please, read comment to r239356. Starting from this revision
dhclient exists on interface down and _remiove_ IP address from
interface. Removal
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 19:26 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:16:03:
IL It has worked this way for me for years. Does it somehow not work this
IL way for everyone?
Please, read comment to r239356. Starting from this revision
dhclient exists on
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 19:55:07:
IL I don't know what teardown the configured lease in that comment means,
IL but it doesn't mean that the interface loses its current configuration,
IL or that any existing connections are perturbed.
Sorry, but comment in PR:
On 2012-08-21 13:45, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone),
LS that dhclient will not work without devd
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:01 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
IL The important point is that if you unplug the cable then plug it into a
IL different network, now the right thing will happen -- you will acquire
IL an address on the new network. That's the reason that this change is an
IL
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL Perhaps the right solution is to add a dhclient command line option to
IL operate in the historical buggy mode: it doesn't exit on link status
IL changes, and fails to work properly if those link status changes are
IL happening because the
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: 374k
IL statically linked (so it already includes this C++ runtime that you
IL think is large).We
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 09:40:27PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL Perhaps the right solution is to add a dhclient command line option to
IL operate in the historical buggy mode: it doesn't exit on link status
IL changes, and fails to
On 8/21/2012 6:34 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
Humm. devd is the more common case, and we explicitly don't use devd to
start
dhclient on boot even when devd is enabled (so out of the box dhcp would
first
be started by rc, but would be restarted by devd).
That sounds reasonable. People who
Hello, Slawa.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:47:46:
SO Not re-request lease, simple renew.
Sorry, I'm not very strong in exact terms here.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:18:15PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
SO Not re-request lease, simple renew.
Sorry, I'm not very strong in exact terms here.
dhcp client can sent different requests:
DHCPDISCOVER from 0.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.255
DHCPREQUEST from 0.0.0.0 to SERVER_IP (from
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit, because it
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 21:01 +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
IL The important point is that if you unplug the cable then plug it into a
IL different network, now the right thing will happen -- you will acquire
IL an address on the new network.
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: 374k
IL statically linked (so it already
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 0:02:18:
WL Haven't looked at the dhclient issues surrounding this tread, but
WL C++ size and bloat of devd is an argument not supported by the objective
facts.
Ok, lets leave C++ alone, but intended address removal (See PR
comments) is POLA
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 0:04:41:
BTW, typical MIPS SoC-based router has only 16MiB of flash. And,
yes, FreeBSD doesn't fit well in this size now, but why add another
mandatory program, only role of which is to monitor network cable and
re-run the same program every
Hello, Warner.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 23:56:11:
WL mosh helps.
And what helps in case of on-line backup? Not every network protocol
and protocol implementation, unfortunately, supports automatic
resume :(
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know.
LS I'm confused by this commit,
On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 14:04 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 11:42 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 21:36:30:
IL I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL apps. The devd executable is not exactly an
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works,
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
IL Of course the right thing to do is invoke the proper rc scripts rather
IL than dhclient directly... this is just to illustrate
Hello, John.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:25:23:
JB Ok, this is what I came up with, somewhat loosely based on OpenBSD's
dhclient.
JB I tested that it survives the following:
JB - Unplugging/replugging does not kill an existing ssh session
JB - Using ifconfig down/up does not kill an
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:36:23AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
IL Of course the right thing to do is invoke the proper rc
On 2012-Aug-21 17:25:23 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok, this is what I came up with, somewhat loosely based on OpenBSD's dhclient.
I tested that it survives the following:
I've also done some limited testing on both bge and fxp NICs and
haven't run into any problems. In
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 05:25:23PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 9:34:31 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 7:53:08 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Garrett.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г., 15:40:35:
GC Try reverting r239356 -- if that works,
On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 21 августа 2012 г.,
On Aug 21, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:36:23AM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Ian.
You wrote 22 августа 2012 г., 1:38:04:
IL For example, this script can replace devd as a daemon that restarts
IL dhclient when any link comes back up...
36 matches
Mail list logo
