> two.
>
> lidl@torb-142: bc -l
> bc 1.06
> Copyright 1991-1994, 1997, 1998, 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
> For details type `warranty'.
> obase=2
> 2025493932409880576
> 11101110
e have some subtle ABI differences between the two systems
(stable/10 vs -head)?
-Kurt
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 06/11/15 06:23, hiren panchasara wrote:
On 06/10/15 at 10:07P, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 20:44 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
On 06/10/15 at 04:13P, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some
tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although
On 06/10/15 22:13, Rick Macklem wrote:
So, is this correct or have I done something stupid?
Yes, this is correct.
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
Hi,
I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some
tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break
anything, the tunables don't get changed by the values in /boot/loader.conf.
By applying a patch like this:
SYSCTL_DECL(_vfs_nfsd);
intnfsrv_statehashsize
On 06/10/15 at 04:13P, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some
tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break
anything, the tunables don't get changed by the values in /boot/loader.conf.
By applying a patch like
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 20:44 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
On 06/10/15 at 04:13P, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some
tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break
anything, the tunables don't get changed by the values
On 06/10/15 at 10:07P, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 20:44 -0700, hiren panchasara wrote:
On 06/10/15 at 04:13P, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
I just MFC'd a patch from head to stable/10 that defines some
tunables using CTLFLAG_RDTUN. Although the MFC didn't break
anything
From Guido Falsi:
On 10/12/13 15:29, John wrote:
Hello currents,
I have a 9.2-R vm and I'd like to bring it up to 10 (i.e what will
eventually be 10-RELEASE). So, do I svn 10-STABLE or HEAD?
I think 10-STABLE but I just want to check.
You are correct.
branch stable/10
Em 13/10/13 04:31, Thomas Mueller escreveu:
From Guido Falsi:
On 10/12/13 15:29, John wrote:
Hello currents,
I have a 9.2-R vm and I'd like to bring it up to 10 (i.e what will
eventually be 10-RELEASE). So, do I svn 10-STABLE or HEAD?
I think 10-STABLE but I just want to check.
You
Hello currents,
I have a 9.2-R vm and I'd like to bring it up to 10 (i.e what will
eventually be 10-RELEASE). So, do I svn 10-STABLE or HEAD?
I think 10-STABLE but I just want to check.
thanks,
--
John
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 10/12/13 15:29, John wrote:
Hello currents,
I have a 9.2-R vm and I'd like to bring it up to 10 (i.e what will
eventually be 10-RELEASE). So, do I svn 10-STABLE or HEAD?
I think 10-STABLE but I just want to check.
You are correct.
branch stable/10 on subversion. It's labelled as ALPHA6
12 matches
Mail list logo
