On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 04:10:02PM -0800, Andy Sparrow wrote:
AFAIK, the AWE cannot work without this, and the cards PnPinfo
seems to not include the other two registers - and if you don't
probe them, then the 'awe' driver check doesn't see the EMU8000...
Is there even a single person out
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 23:33:26 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [2222 23:25], Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
Should be used instead.
I am so in favor of just declaring voxware dead... But the armchair
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:10:02 -0800,
Andy Sparrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Andy Unfortunately for those of us who used to use 'pnp' commands in
Andy userconfig to probe/init the AWE registers, the AWE wavetable is
Andy already useless in -current.
Andy AFAIK, the AWE cannot work without this,
-On [2221 21:15], Lyndon Nerenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
LINT has an entry for an 'awe' device, however there doesn't appear
to be any corresponding source code in the tree. Is this device dead?
If so, the entry should be removed from LINT, or an appropriate
comment added.
device pcm
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
Should be used instead.
I am so in favor of just declaring voxware dead... But the armchair
generals wouldn't like that.
The awe device controls the AWE's wavetable.. newpcm doesn't talk to this
(yet - no idea if there are any plans)
---
-On [2222 23:25], Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
Should be used instead.
I am so in favor of just declaring voxware dead... But the armchair
generals wouldn't like that.
The awe device controls the AWE's wavetable.. newpcm
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
That's why I wanted to kill voxware in 4.0, would allow pcm to be used
from default... Now we're stuck to the voxware crap for another release
cycle until 5.0 hits the public.
shrugs You don't _have_ to use it :)
---
Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 03:46:04PM -0700, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 23:33:26 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
-On [2222 23:25], Daniel O'Connor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
Should be used instead.
I
