Re: syslog bug

2003-02-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030209 08:39] wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : syslog(3) botches things if you pass it a string that has %%m in it. : this should fix it, any comments? : With the above fix, fred %%m will

Re: syslog bug

2003-02-09 Thread David Malone
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:00:02AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Heh, the format string is passed through printf later, we don't want to eat the extra % otherwise it will cause problems for us. I had exactly the same thought as Warner last night, but then realised that we were about to call

Re: syslog bug

2003-02-09 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* David Malone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030209 10:04] wrote: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:00:02AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Heh, the format string is passed through printf later, we don't want to eat the extra % otherwise it will cause problems for us. I had exactly the same thought as Warner

syslog bug

2003-02-08 Thread Alfred Perlstein
syslog(3) botches things if you pass it a string that has %%m in it. this should fix it, any comments? Index: syslog.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/syslog.c,v retrieving revision 1.28 diff -u -r1.28 syslog.c --- syslog.c