top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86 836 root -80 532K 276K biord 1 0:07 0.00% 0.00%

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00%

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86 836 root -80

RE: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not one that I've seen: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 49.37% idle: cpu0 10 root -160 0K

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:46 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmm... mine loks like that (modulo #CPUs), except when I'm actually making it do some work (re-building the kernel, in this case). What I see ("top -S") looks like: last pid: 9546; load averages: 0.97,

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Also, I happened to note that as I'm doing a "make buildworld" (for today's -STABLE, running in yesterday's -STABLE), my "top -S" output shows a large number of "0.00" entries for CPU (on the same laptop as my previously-reported results). So it may be odd, but at least -- in my case -- it

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:45 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keep in mind that we no longer charge interrupt time to the process being interrupted, instead all that interrupt handling has been pushed off into ithreads. Same for software

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK; that's a good useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some IRQ-related entries in top's output. Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s should always add up to about 100 (with

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK; that's a good useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some IRQ-related entries in top's output. Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s

Re: top output broked?

2001-03-27 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86