Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 19:40:58 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Why has this tunable by default a value which makes the machine unstable by every umass I plug in which has no qirk entry? And if I look how many quirks there are I assume that almost every device

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-23 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:31:21PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: As far as I'm concerned, USB is a Very Black Art(tm), and has been since day one. 8-(. You have to wonder how Windows manages... Windows manages because it is in the vendor's interest for it to work and as such their install

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-23 Thread Terry Lambert
Josef Karthauser wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:31:21PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: As far as I'm concerned, USB is a Very Black Art(tm), and has been since day one. 8-(. You have to wonder how Windows manages... Windows manages because it is in the vendor's interest for it to work

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-23 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:00:00AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Josef Karthauser wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:31:21PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: As far as I'm concerned, USB is a Very Black Art(tm), and has been since day one. 8-(. You have to wonder how Windows manages...

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-22 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 19:40:58 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Kenneth D. Merry wrote: seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It has been renamed:

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-22 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Kenneth D. Merry wrote: OIC. It's not available until the device is pluged in, which makes it absolutely useless. When I plug it in the machine behaves abnormal, so I need to set it BEFORE connecting USB devices. Then you can set it in your loader.conf file instead. It's a loader

where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Hello all, while my CF-Card USB adaptor is crashing 5.1 and my NEC USB floppy also crashes 5.1 I found that sysctl -w kern.cam.da.no_6_byte=1 could help but it seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It also seems I'm a bit unlucky these days with 5.1. CF-Reader

Re: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 09:13:51 +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Hello all, while my CF-Card USB adaptor is crashing 5.1 and my NEC USB floppy also crashes 5.1 I found that sysctl -w kern.cam.da.no_6_byte=1 could help but it seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Kenneth D. Merry wrote: seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It has been renamed: kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size Where %d is the unit number for the da(4) device. Thaks a lot! Where can I find such info? I looked via cvsweb for scsi_da.c but

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Kenneth D. Merry wrote: seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It has been renamed: kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size Where %d is the unit number for the da(4) device. Thaks a lot! Where can I

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Kenneth D. Merry wrote: seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It has been renamed: kern.cam.da.%d.minimum_cmd_size Where %d is the unit number for the da(4)

RE: where is kern.ca.da.no_6_byte?

2003-07-20 Thread Andre Guibert de Bruet
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Kenneth D. Merry wrote: seems that this sysctl doesn't exist any more! Is there anything similar? It has been renamed: